This is our detailed review of the latest generation of the Asus ROG Flow X13 series, in the GV302XV variant built on AMD Ryzen 9 7000 and Nvidia RTX 4000 hardware.
We’ve reviewed the previous variants of the Flow X13 series , and this 2023/2024 iteration is a significant overhaul of the past generations, with an updated chassis and refined IO, updated AMD Ryzen + Nvidia RTX specs running at higher power than before, an updated cooling module, a larger battery, and a new display. Hence, this little fellow is a highly versatile all-purpose computer in its class, and quite a serious gaming machine as well.
Note: As of the first part of 2024, Asus haven’t updated the Flow X13 to 2024 hardware (Ryzen 8000, Nvidia RTX 4000) and I don’t think they plan to. Hence, the 2023 model tested here remains the latest model and the one you should look for in 2024. Will update if this changes in any way.
Just a heads-up, I purposely delayed this review so I could use the Flow X13 for a few months so I can share a more detailed experience of this series.
I’ve also used this laptop alongside the latest ROG Flow Z13 tablet and the 2023 ROG Zephyrus G14 , which are devices that target a rather similar audience. Sort of. Furthermore, I’m especially interested in this series as a potential compact travel/work laptop, as I plan on finally retiring my old XPS 13 from this role .
Hence, I’ve used this for the last two months, longer than I usually allocate to a review sample, and I’ve gathered my thoughts and impressions on this updated Asus ROG Flow X13 series in this following laptop review.
Specs as reviewed – 2023/2024 Asus ROG Flow X13
ASUS ROG Flow X13 GV302XV, 2023/2024 generation
Display 13.4-inch, 16:10, touch, glossy,Nebula QHD+ 2560 x 1600 px, IPS, 165 Hz 3ms, 500 nits, 100% DCI-P3
Processor AMD Zen4 Ryzen 7000, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, 8C/16T
Video AMD Radeon 780M + Nvidia RTX 4060 Laptop 8GB dGPU 60W, with MUX, Advanced Optimus, Nvidia GSync
Memory 16 GB LPDDR5-6400 (soldered), 32 GB on RTX 4070 Laptop configurations
Storage 1 TB SSD – 1x M.2 2230 PCIe 4.0 slot
Connectivity
WiFi 6E (Mediatek MT7922) 2×2 with Bluetooth 5.3
Ports Left: 1x USB-C 3.2 gen 2 with data, DP and charging (XG Mobile port), HDMI 2.1 FRL, audio jack
Battery 75 Wh, 130 W USB-C power adapter
Size 299 mm or 11.77” (w) x 213 mm or 8.38” (d) x 16.75 – 18.75 mm or .66″ – .74″ (h)
Weight 1.3 kg (2.9 lbs) + .49 kg (1.08 lbs) for the 130W USB-C charger and cables, EU version
Extras convertible format with 360-degree hinges, touchscreen and pen support,
This review unit is a mid-tier configuration for the 2023 model year, code name Flow X13 GV302XV, with the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS processor, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU running at 60W TGP, 16 GB of RAM, and the Nebula QHD+ IPS display.
However, most of our findings apply to the other available configurations as well, and we’ll also touch on the performance of the RTX 4050 and RTX 4070 configurations in this article, as well as cover the performance of the Radeon 780M iGPU in a separate review .
Here are the configurations available for this Asus Flow X13 generation:
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XI – AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 60W + QHD+ display;
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV – AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 60W + QHD+ display;
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XU – AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 60W + QHD+ display;
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XA – AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + AMD Radeon 780M + FHD+ display.
For comparison, the previous 2021 and 2022 X13 generations were built on Ryzen 9 5900HS or Ryzen 9 6900HS AMD processors with Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 or Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti graphics. Thus, aside from the bump in performance offered by the updated chips, these latest X13 GV302 models also benefit from higher power settings and better cooling, as you’ll see further down in this laptop review.
Design and construction – 2-in-1 ultracompact gaming laptop The Flow X13 is a 13-inch 2-in-1 laptop with a 360-degree convertible touchscreen.
It weighs about 3 lbs and it’s fairly compact and portable for its class. In fact, it’s a smaller footprint and weight than the previous X13 generations, but still not quite on par with the thinnest and lightest designs out there . That’s because this packs way more powerful hardware than the average ultrabook, requiring a more complex thermal module to cope with that hardware.
Nonetheless, this will easily fit inside any bag and should be perfectly fine as a work/commute/travel device for most people that are willing to trade-in a little portability for the extra performance this Flow X13 offers.
The overall design is a slight refinement of the previous X13 chassis. This is still and all-black device, with different textures used for the metal lid and underside, as well as the plastic arm-rest. This also gets very clean and professional looks, with subtle and subdued branding elements. Just make sure to peel off those crooked stickers from the arm-rest.
The materials and textures provide excellent grip, and don’t smudge quite as easily as matte metal finishes do. But keep realistic, this will still show dusts and fingerprints and finger oil, so you’ll have to rub it clean often. I’ve included a picture of how my unit looked after about a week of continuous use without any cleaning.
Overall, I’m fine with the black theme used here, but I can see how some of you might prefer a more hassle-free dark-gray metal finishing, the kind other brands offer these days. I would kind of prefer that as well.
Anyway, as mentioned earlier, the Asus Flow X13 is a 2-in-1 convertible format with a 360-degrees display , so it allows for laptop, tablet and several other modes in between. It primarily excels as a laptop, though, which is what most potential buyers will use it as anyway.
Before we continue, I also wanted to better illustrate the size of this ROG Flow X13 in rapport to a few other popualr devices.
First, here it is next to the Asus ROG Zephyrus G14, another compact performance laptop. A more powerful computer, for sure, but also larger, thicker and heavier.
And here it is next to a full-size modern laptop, the 16-inch Lenovo Legion Pro 7i.
Back to the X13, despite being smaller than before, Asus redesigned the main chassis in order to still fit a full and uncompromised keyboard, but also leave space for a larger arm-rest underneath and a much more spacious glass clickpad. However, there wasn’t room for up-firing speakers, as the speakers still fire from the underside.
However, the ergonomics of this series remain excellent. Asus implemented larger rubber feet on the bottom, which improve the grip on the desk, implemented some solid and smooth hinges, as well as kept the corners and edges blunted and friendly on the wrists.
As this is a 2-in-1 convertible format, the X13 Flow comes with two particularities that you’ll have to accept. Number one, the rubber feet need to remain slim profile in order to allow for the tablet format, and this impacts the cooling and performance with demanding loads, when using this flat on a desk. So you’ll want to consider some sort of raiser stand for that.
Number two, there are these small rubber pads in the corners of the arm-rest, meant for the display to lean on when having the laptop closed of and prevent the glass from touching the keys and main-deck. Those are on-top of the rubber gasket implemented around the entire glass screen. With the past X13 generations, these rubber pieces tend to peel of quickly. They haven’t yet on my unit, but they might over time.
I’ve also seen people complaining about the black finishing of the arm-rest wearing off quite easily on the previous Flow X13 chassis. I’m not seeing any wear signs on my unit, any scuffs or scratches, despite using this for the last month and always having a watch on my left wrist. That’s not going to mean much at this point, though, since this is still a rather new device, but perhaps Asus were able to refine and reinforce the finishing with this updated series ? Time will tell.
Realistically, this is a black device and I expect to finishing to chip and scratch in time, but especially on the metal exterior pieces. We’ll see, I’ll keep you posted if I decide on getting one of these long term.
One final aspect that I need to touch on here is the IO.
This generation gets two USB-C ports, one on each side and both with data/power and charging. One of them is USB 4.0 compatible and the other is USB 3.2 gen 2 and integrated within the XG Mobile interface for the ROG XG Mobile external GPU. Plus, I like how the rubber cap that covers the XG mobile connector is now attached to the chassis, unlike in the past; this way, it should be harder to loose.
There’s also an USB-A port, a full HDMI 2.1 FRL port, a micro SD card reader and an audio jack.
Overall, this is a versatile compact design with good ergonomics and IO. The black smudgy design might not be for everyone, but other than that, I can hardly find it any flaws.
Keyboard and trackpad The keyboard on this ROG X13 doesn’t seem to have changed from the one implemented in the previous generation, and that’s mostly a good thing.
This 13-inch laptop implements a proper keyboard layout with full-sized and well-spaced keycaps. The arrows are half-sized, and there’s the extra set of media keys in the top-left corner, as on all ROG devices.
The typing experience is solid here, with 1.7 mm travel depth and firm key feedback. The keys also feel nice to the touch, but I must add that they smudge quite easily, due to their black soft finishing.
This keyboard is also backlit, with some very bright LEDs. There’s no RGB, though, all you’re getting is white backlighting. I’m fine with it. The lighting can be reactivated with a swipe over the clickpad once it fades out, and a physical Caps Lock indicator is present.
The touchpad is an update on this generation, a much larger area than before, and overall one of the best implementations available in compact Windows laptops. It’s also a smooth glass surface, despite its graphical texture perhaps suggesting otherwise. That’s just a graphical detail underneath the glass.
As for biometrics, there’s no longer a finger sensor in the power button with this generation, but IR support is built alongside the main FHD camera now.
Screen – 13-inch and perfect for a gaming device The Flow X13 gets a 13.4-inch 16:10 touch display, with two panel choices for this generation.
FHD+ 120Hz 7ms with 500 nits of brightness and 100% sRGB colors;
QHD+ 165Hz 3ms with 500 nits of brightness and 100% DCI-P3 colors, with GSync.
We have the QHD+ variant on our sample, which Asus markets as a Nebula panel and is a novelty for the series, an overall a better-balanced option for this sort of computer than the UHD+ panel offered before. The hardware can handle this resolution well, better than I could handle the 4K resolution of the previous generations, and this panel is simply much better suited for gaming with the 165Hz refresh, fast response times, and the GSync support.
Here are our findings for the QHD+ panel, with an X-Rite i1 Display Pro sensor :
Panel HardwareID: TL134ADXP01-0;
Coverage: 99.8% sRGB, 85.0% AdobeRGB, 98.0% DCI-P3;
Type: IPS, 2560 x 1600 px resolution, 10-bit HDR ;
Measured gamma: 2.23;
Max brightness in the middle of the screen: 479.26 cd/m2 on power;
Min brightness in the middle of the screen: 24.23 cd/m2 on power;
Contrast at max brightness: 1122:1;
White point: 6800 K;
Black on max brightness: 0.422 cd/m2;
PWM: No.
Nothing to complain about, but you’ll ideally want to calibrate this for any sort of color-accurate work. The color uniformity is fine, but with a variation in DeltaE in the top-right corner.
I haven’t noticed bad bleeding on this panel, although I must note that the blacks get a little washed up at higher brightness settings, hence the contrast is only around 1100:1.
If you’re interested in the FHD+ panel offered for this series, that hasn’t changed from the 2022 model, so here’s what to expect:
Panel HardwareID: Sharp SHP1558 (LQ134N1JW55);
Coverage: 98.2% sRGB, 69.8% AdobeRGB, 72.1% DCI-P3;
Type: 1920 x 1200px resolution, 8-bit SDR ;
Measured gamma: 2.23;
Max brightness in the middle of the screen: 539.76 cd/m2 on power;
Min brightness in the middle of the screen: 25.56 cd/m2 on power;
Contrast at max brightness: 1433:1;
White point: 6600 K;
Black on max brightness: 0.37 cd/m2;
PWM: No.
It’s still a fine panel, just lower resolution and not as color rich as the QHD option. It’s also not as fast, something to consider if the gaming experience is a high priority for you. At the same time, this panel should allow the laptop to last for longer on battery use.
Hardware and performance – AMD Ryzen 9, RTX 4060 Our test model is the mid-specced configuration of the Asus ROG Flow x13, code name GV302XYV built on an AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS CPU, 16 GB of LPDDR5-6400 memory, 1 TB of SSD storage, and dual graphics: the Nvidia RTX 4060 8GB dGPU and the Radeon 780M integrated within the AMD processor.
Before we proceed, keep in mind that our review sample is a retail version and was sent over by Asus. It runs on the mature software available as of mid-September 2023 (BIOS 311, Asus Armoury Crate 5.6.10, GeForce 537.13 drivers). Very little can further change with later software at this point.
Spec-wise, this Asus X13 Flow is built on the latest AMD and Nvidia mobile hardware available to date.
The Ryzen 9 7940HS is the top-tier Ryzen Phoenix 7000 platform, built on AMD’s most advanced Zen4 cores. It’s an 8 Cores and 16 Threads CPU, and doesn’t get a hybrid design as the Intel options available today. But is still a very fast processor for this class, especially thanks to its prowess at mid and lower power settings.
For the GPU, this Flow X13 is available with a wide range of RTX 4000 chips. What we have on this unit is the mid-level graphics option, the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop dGPU running at up to 60W of power with Dynamic Boost. This is a Max-Q implementation, with a lower TGP than on larger gaming devices.
Configurations with Nvidia GeForce 4050 and 4070 graphics are also available, as well as a variant without a dedicated graphics chip, relying entirely on the Radeon 780M iGPU .
There’s also a MUX on this design, for uncompromised gaming performance, with support for Nvidia’s Advanced Optimus technology and GSync on the main display
The RAM is soldered on this design. Most configurations, including our own, come with 16 GB of LPDDR5 RAM, and 32 GB are only available on the highest tier R9 + RTX 4070 Laptop GPU variant. I would have preferred having 32 GB on this variant as well.
For storage, there’s an M.2 2230 gen4 slot inside this device. Our units gets a Micron 2400 drive, a gen4 “value” option with middling write/read performance. Upgrades are possible, but will be difficult past 1 TB with this 2230 format.
Getting inside to the components is a fairly simple task. For that, you need to take out the bottom D-panel, held in place by a few Philips screws.
Inside you get unrestrained access to the SSD slot, the WiFi module, battery, speakers, and thermal module. Everything is packed tightly inside this compact chassis.
Specs aside, Asus offer their standard power profiles in the Asus Armoury Crate control app: Silent, Performance, Turbo, and Manual, with various power settings and fan profiles between them, summarized in the following table.
Silent Performance Turbo Manual
CPU only, SPL/SPPT TDP
35/45W
40/54W
55/60W
55/60W
GPU only, max TGP
40W
50W
60W
60W
Crossload
~50W, 1015 + 35-40 W
~55W, 10-15W + 40-45 W
~70W, 10-20 + 50-60 W
~70W, 10-20 + 50-60 W
Noise at head-level, tested
~35 dBA
~40 dBA
~45 dBA
~50 dBA, max fans
Before we jump to the performance section, here’s how this laptop handles everyday use and multitasking on the Silent profile, unplugged from the wall. For what is worth, the fans keep idle on this Silent mode with casual use, as long as the dGPU is inactive and the CPU stays under 50 degrees C. That’s only happens with very light use on this Flow X13, though, especially when using it plugged in.
Performance and benchmarks On to more demanding loads, we start by testing the CPU’s performance by running the Cinebench R15 test for 15+ times in a loop, with a 1-2 seconds delay between each run.
In this test, the Ryzen 9 CPU stabilizes at ~60W of sustained power on the Turbo setting, with temperatures of 95 C and scores of around 2500 points. The fans spin at ~44 dB at head level in this mode.
The CPU is power limited in this implementation, despite it running at very high temperatures. Bumping the back of the laptop off the desk in order to improve the airflow of fresh air into the fans has a notable influence, allowing the processor to stabilize at sub 90 degrees Celsius.
There’s also the option of using the Manual profile and bumping the fans to 100% rpms, while still having the back bumped off the desk. This doesn’t change things, as the fans are already running close to their max capacity on Turbo.
Switching over to the Performance profile translates in the CPU mostly running at 55W of power, but with occasional dips to sub 40 W. The processor runs hot at 55W, at 95+ C, while the fans spin at around 40 dBA. The scores take a dip of 10% at the higher power settings, but drop notably when the power drops as well.
On the Silent profile, the CPU fluctuates once more, this time between 15-45W, with barely audible fans (sub 35 dB) and temperatures in the 80s and 70s.
Finally, the CPU fluctuates once more on battery power, on the Performance profile, between 30 to 55W. Details below.
And here’s how this AMD Ryzen 9 processor implementation performs in comparison to the AMD hardware in the previous Asus ROG X13 generations, as well as a few other 2023 devices.
I find it especially interesting how close this Ryzen 9 7940HS CPU comes to the same Ryzen 9 implemented in the larger and better cooled ROG Zephyrus G14 or Razer Blade 14. As you’ll see in a bit, this Turbo results for Cinebench R15 is a little bit misleading here, but still two two implementations are very close of each other, within more or less 10%, despite the obvious difference in cooling capacity between the two designs.
So, we then went ahead and further verified our findings with the more taxing Cinebench R23 loop test and Blender – Classroom. On Cinebench R23, the sustained power settings between profiles were different than on Cinebench R15, arguably because this is a more demanding load. I 55W sustained for Turbo, 40W sustained for Performance mode and 35W sustained for Silent mode, with alright CPU temperatures (~90 C for Turbo, ~75 C for Performance and Silent).
And then we went to Blender 3.41 – Classroom, where is measured the same power settings: 55W sustained for Turbo, 40W sustained for Performance, 40W sustained for Silent.
We also ran the 3DMark CPU test on the Turbo profile. In this test, the Ryzen 9 processor in the Flow X13 scores similarly to the Zephyrus G14 / Blade 14 implementations, which suggests that the CPU works at 60+W. But don’t forget this is a quicker test, and not a longer demanding CPU activity, as the previous tests.
Finally, we ran our combined CPU+GPU stress tests on this notebook. 3DMark stress runs the same test for 20 times in a loop and looks for performance variation and degradation over time. Surprisingly, this review unit passed the test with the laptop sitting flat on the desk, despite the fact that the cooling module is slightly choked in this situation. I wasn’t expecting is based on my experience with the previous X13 generations and the larger Flow X16 models. We’ll further discuss why this happens in the Gaming section.
Next, we ran the entire suite of tests and benchmarks, on the Turbo profile with the GPU set on the Standard mode (MUX on Advanced Optimus), and with the screen set at the native QHD+ resolution.
Here’s what we got:
3DMark 13 –CPU profile: max – 7777, 16 – 7779, 8 – 6679, 4 – 3920, 2 – 2032, 1 – 1035;3DMark 13 – Fire Strike (DX11): 20390 (Graphics – 22507, Physics – 27910, Combined – 9667);3DMark 13 – Port Royal (RTX): 4838;3DMark 13 – Time Spy (DX12): 8645 (Graphics – 8424, CPU – 10162);3DMark 13 – Speed Way (DX12 Ultimate): 2059;Uniengine Superposition – 1080p Extreme: 5007;Uniengine Superposition – 1080p Medium: 14154;Handbrake 1.3.3 (4K to 1080p encode): 55.27 average fps;Handbrake 1.6.1 (4K to 1080p encode): 66.53 average fps;PCMark 10: 7729 (Essentials – 10775, Productivity – 10360, Digital Content Creation – 11226);GeekBench 5.5.0 64-bit: Multi-core: 10970, Single-Core: 1969;GeekBench 6.0.2 64-bit: Multi-core: 10891, Single-Core: 2453;CineBench R15 (best run): CPU 2641 cb, CPU Single Core 290 cb;CineBench R20 (best run): CPU 6499 cb, CPU Single Core 699 cb;CineBench R23: CPU 16531 cb (best single run), CPU 16436 cb (10 min run), CPU Single Core 1828 cb;x265 HD Benchmark 64-bit: 24.46 s.
And here are some workstation benchmarks, on the same Turbo profile:
Blender 3.01 – BMW scene – CPU Compute: 2m 34s ;Blender 3.01 – BMW scene – GPU Compute: 25.35s (CUDA), 11.38s (Optix);Blender 3.01 – Classroom scene – CPU Compute: 5m 51s;Blender 3.01 – Classroom scene – GPU Compute: 50.53s (CUDA), 25.17s (Optix);Blender 3.41 – BMW scene – CPU Compute: 2m 33s;Blender 3.41 – BMW scene – GPU Compute: 26.41s (CUDA), 10.55s (Optix);Blender 3.41 – Classroom scene – CPU Compute: 5m 56s;Blender 3.41 – Classroom scene – GPU Compute: 51.31s (CUDA), 23.68s (Optix);
PugetBench – DaVinci Resolve: 1320 points;PugetBench – Adobe After Effects: -;PugetBench – Adobe Photoshop: 889;PugetBench – Adobe Premiere: 581;
SPECviewperf 2020 – 3DSMax: 59.63;SPECviewperf 2020 – Catia: 36.37;SPECviewperf 2020 – Creo: 57.67;SPECviewperf 2020 – Energy: 28.72;SPECviewperf 2020 – Maya: 244.32;SPECviewperf 2020 – Medical: 29.55;SPECviewperf 2020 – SNX: 18.24;SPECviewperf 2020 – SW: 184.98.V-Ray Benchmark: 10955 – CPU, 984 – CUDA, 1485 – RTX.
These are excellent results for a 13-inch portable gaming l aptop. In fact, this Flow is on of the fastest and overall best gaming laptops in its class, alongside the Flow Z13 tablet format .
As mentioned already, this AMD Ryzen 7000 HS platform is within 5-10% of the multi-threaded performance of the same Ryzen 9 7940HS implemented in the ROG Zephyrus G14 or the Razer Blade 14, and actually scores higher in the single-core tests. The differences are within the margin of error, though.
At the same time, the performance of this ROG X13 is miles beyond most other 13-inch devices available out there, powered by lower-tier hardware platforms running at lower power.
The only real competitor for this X13 is the ROG Flow Z13 , the Intel-based counterpart in the Asus ROG Flow series. The Intel Core i9-13900H in that one scores higher in both multi and single threaded tests, with differences being around 10-20% between activities. You can find the exact results in the Z13 reviews (i9 + RTX 4060 model here , i9 + RTX 4070 model here ), further down in this article, and we’ll also have a detailed follow-up comparison between the ROG Flow X13 and Flow Z13 2023 models (which I’ll link here when published).
Moving on, as far as the GPU performance goes, this a capable mid-tier performer in today’s market. Sure, it’s not as powerful as a full-size computer that implements a full-power RTX 4060 140W, but it still offers roughly 70% of the graphics capabilities of an ROG Strix G16 or Lenovo Legion Pro 5i , 0r 80% of the capabilities of a more portable design such as the ROG Zephyrus G16 (RTX 4060 120W) . And is incomparably more powerful than the RTX 3050Ti chip available in the previous Flow models.
At the same time, the ROG Flow Z13 still has a slight advantage in the 13-inch space, due to its slightly higher-power GPU implementation (65 vs 60 W). But that advantage is within 5% tops. Here’s a brief comparison between the two Flow models, based on our reviews (both with recent software):
R9-7940HS + 4060 60W i9-13900H + 4060 65W i9-13900H + 4070 65W
3DMark – Fire Strike 20390 (G – 22507, P – 27910, C – 9667)
19841 (G – 22070, P – 29494, C – 8395)
21120 (G – 23327, P – 30544, C – 9724)
3DMark – Port Royal 4838
4885
6030
3DMark – Time Spy 8645 (Graphics – 8424, CPU – 10162)
8951 (Graphics – 8462, CPU – 13321)
9867 (Graphics – 9476, CPU – 12887)
Uniengine Superposition – 1080p Extreme 5007
5089
5391
CineBench R23 (best run) 16531 cb – multi core,
18670 cb – multi core,
18426 cb – multi core,
Blender 3.01 – Classroom scene – CPU Compute 5m 56s
5m 40s
5m 53s
Blender 3.01 – Classroom scene – GPU Compute 51.31s (CUDA), 23.68s (Optix)
50.51s (CUDA), 27.24s (Optix)
44.23s (CUDA), 24.56s (Optix)
SPECviewperf 2020 – 3DSMax: 59.63
79.69
88.84
SPECviewperf 2020 – Catia: 36.37
50.93
55.01
SPECviewperf 2020 – Maya: 244.32
320.55
313.80
This table is also a good indication of what to expect in frame rates and gaming power from the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 implementation in the Flow X13 GV302XI configuration: roughly 95% of the the scores measured on the 4070 version of the ROG Flow Z13 above. In other words, a ~10% increase over the 4060 configuration in regular graphics loads, at this sort of power.
At up to 20% in RT loads, although when it comes to games at least, RT should mostly be considered with DLSS capabilities at this level of graphics chips and power. That’s because the Ray Tracing performance is still debatable in this segment.
There’s also an RTX 4050 configuration, the Flow X13 GV302XU. That should score within 10% of the 4050 75W implemented in the Lenovo Slim Pro 9i reviewed here . That means about 10-15% less than the 4060 in this X13 unit.
All these aside, if graphics performance matter to you, don’t forget that this Asus Flow X13 is compatible with the Asus ROG XG Mobile external GPU, which can be specced up to an RTX 4090 Laptop GPU at 150W TGP. I’ve tested my unit the with 4090 ROG XG Mobile, and we’ll discuss that in a separate article about the ROG Flow X13 and Flow Z13 when connected to the XG Mobile eGPU. But as a brief spoiler, here are some scores for the X13:
3DMark 13 – Fire Strike (DX11): 33650 (Graphics – 42879, Physics – 28345, Combined – 14421);3DMark 13 – Port Royal (RTX): 12338;3DMark 13 – Time Spy (DX12): 17607 (Graphics – 19826, CPU – 10769).
This combo allows for higher mixed use power to be allocated to the Ryzen CPU, as the eGPU takes over graphics. Plus, the RTX 4090 150W is more than 2x the performance of the 4060 60W inside the Flow.
Turbo Mode vs. Performance, Silent Let’s touch on the Performance and Silent profiles offered in Armoury Crate.
This laptop runs at ~44-45 dBA on the Turbo profile, which is not as loud as on a larger gaming laptop, but still noticeable in most environments. If you’re willing to sacrifice the performance to some extent in order to keep the fans even quieter, the Performance and Silent profiles should be of interest.
Here’s how this ROG X13 performs on the Performance profile, which limits the fans to around 39-40 dBA at head level.
3DMark 13 – Fire Strike: 17531 (Graphics – 19686, Physics – 24695, Combined – 7771);3DMark 13 – Time Spy: 7571 (Graphics – 7302, CPU – 9579);Uniengine Superposition – 1080p Extreme: 4398;CineBench R20 (best run): CPU 5137 cb, CPU Single Core 632 CB;Blender 3.41 – Classroom scene – CPU Compute: 7m 24s.
We’re looking at ~10-15% drop in capabilities compared to the Turbo mode. Not bad at all, but we need to keep an eye on internal temperatures as well. More on that in a bit, in the Gaming section.
You can also opt for the Silent profile, in which case the fans won’t go over 35 dB. Here’s what we got in this case:
3DMark 13 – Fire Strike: 16548 (Graphics – 18619, Physics – 22741, Combined – 7380);3DMark 13 – Time Spy: 7144 (Graphics – 6907, CPU – 8874);Uniengine Superposition – 1080p Extreme: 4116;CineBench R20 (best run): CPU 4528 cb, CPU Single Core 580 CB;Blender 3.41 – Classroom scene – CPU Compute: 7m 50s.
These are roughly 80% of what the system scores on Turbo, and a little lower, around 70%, with sustained CPU tests such as Blender. Not bad at all for for how quietly the laptop runs in this mode.
Gaming Benchmarks and Performance Let’s see how this Asus X13 generation handles modern games.
We tested various games on the available power profiles at QHD+ and FHD+ resolution, all with the MUX set on the Ultimate GPU mode.
Here are the results:
Ryzen 9 7940HS + QHD+ Turbo, QHD+ Performance, FHD+ Turbo, FHD+ Silent,
Cyberpunk 2077 38 fps (27 fps – 1% low)
33 fps (23 fps – 1% low)
60 fps (39 fps – 1% low)
44 fps (31 fps – 1% low)
Doom Eternal 137 fps (66 fps – 1% low)
118 fps (42 fps – 1% low)
196 fps (56 fps – 1% low)
162 fps (58 fps – 1% low)
Far Cry 6 59 fps (47 fps – 1% low)
51 fps (42 fps – 1% low)
73 fps (58 fps – 1% low)
64 fps (49 fps – 1% low)
Far Cry 5 74 fps (52 fps – 1% low)
64 fps (48 fps – 1% low)
97 fps (54 fps – 1% low)
66 fps (56 fps – 1% low)
Metro Exodus 45 fps (30 fps – 1% low)
–
58 fps (34 fps – 1% low)
–
Red Dead Redemption 2 53 fps (28 fps – 1% low)
48 fps (26 fps – 1% low)
71 fps (32 fps – 1% low)
58 fps (24 fps – 1% low)
Resident Evil 4 52 fps (34 fps – 1% low)
48 fps (31 fps – 1% low)
78 fps (34 fps – 1% low)
68 fps (36 fps – 1% low)
Shadow of Tomb Raider 63 fps (54 fps – 1% low)
56 fps (46 fps – 1% low)
93 fps (68 fps – 1% low)
81 fps (65 fps – 1% low)
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt (v4.04) 69 fps (42 fps – 1% low)
61 fps (40 fps – 1% low)
88 fps (52 fps – 1% low)
73 fps (48 fps – 1% low)
Battlefield V, Cyberpunk, Doom, Witcher 3 – recorded with Fraps/in-game FPS counter in campaign mode;
Far Cry 5, 6, Metro, Red Dead Redemption 2, Tomb Raider – recorded with the included Benchmark utilities;
Red Dead Redemption 2 Optimized profile based on these settings .
Those above are rasterization tests, and here are some results for RT – Ray Tracing gaming performance, with and without DLSS.
Ryzen 9 7940HS + RTX 4060 Laptop 45-60W QHD+ Turbo, dGPU FHD+ Turbo, dGPU
Cyberpunk 2077 15 fps (11 fps – 1% low)
20 fps (12 fps – 1% low)
Cyberpunk 2077 48 fps (34 fps – 1% low)
77 fps (58 fps – 1% low)
Doom Eternal 78 fps (33 fps – 1% low)
142 fps (38 fps – 1% low)
Doom Eternal 28 fps (12 fps – 1% low)
192 fps (40 fps – 1% low)
Far Cry 6 51 fps (42 fps – 1% low)
62 fps (50 fps – 1% low)
Shadow of Tomb Raider 39 fps (26 fps – 1% low)
61 fps (41 fps – 1% low)
Shadow of Tomb Raider 47 fps (34 fps – 1% low)
68 fps (41 fps – 1% low)
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt (v4.04 update) 29 fps (22 fps – 1% low)
36 fps (25 fps – 1% low)
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt (v4.04 update) 37 fps (28 fps – 1% low)
52 fps (38 fps – 1% low)
These are pretty good frame rate results for a 13-inch gaming machine, as most titles are running well here. However, recent AAA games struggle to average above 60 fps at QHD resolution with Ultra settings. So expect to have to adjust some things with the latest titles, especially the more demanding ones.
The Flow X13 in this RTX 4060 configuration offers decent gaming capabilities compared to what you would be getting with a larger 4060 notebook. At the same time, this is a compact and lightweight chassis, so when you also factor in the ultraportable 13-inch format, you’re pretty much getting here one of the best gaming ultrabooks available in stores.
As for RT performance, that’s a tough one on this 4060 configuration. Opting for DLSS helps, especially in titles that support DLSS3, but even this technology can’t do miracles on a low-power 4060. It should make more of a difference in the 4070 Laptop GPU variant, though.
In conclusion, don’t forget we’re dealing with a 13-inch 3-lbs laptop here. From that perspective, these above gaming results are outstanding, and almost unimaginable with past hardware generations at this size.
With these out of the way, let’s go through some of the gaming performance logs on each profile.
On Turbo, the combined CPU+GPU power goes up to around 70W on this design, with the fans ramping up to 44-45 dBA at head level. The GPU runs at up to 60W in most titles, especially at QHD resolution, and that only leaves a little bit of power to the CPU.
These settings allow for some excellent internal temperatures, with the CPU running in the mid-70S and the GPU in the low-80s. Not bad at all.
Placing this on a stand or at least propping up the back of the laptop by 2-3 cm leads to a significant decrease in CPU/GPU temperatures, of around 5-8 degrees Celsius. That means the CPU ends up running in the mid 60s Celsius, and the low to mid-70s.
I’m not even going to discuss the Manual mode here, given the results of the Turbo profile. This mode allows for various tweaks on the power settings and fan curves, though, so feel free to customize things away in there if you want to.
However, playing games on Performance or Silent modes should be considered if you’re looking for a decrease in fan noise.
Performance mode limits the fan noise to sub 40 dBA, but also limits crossload power, which results in only up to 50W being allocated to the GPU. However, that’s rather more like 40-45 in the games we’ve tested. This means that framerates take a 15-20% hit. Normally, I’d be fine with it, but at this level, those 20% might make a notable difference, especially at QHD resolution.
The temperatures, however, are excellent in this mode: high60s on the CPU and low-70s on the GPU, with the laptop on the desk.
And about 5-7 degrees lower when having it on a stand.
Silent mode further limits the GPU, which ends up running at 35-40W. It also makes the fans barely audible at all, at around 35 dBA. Furthermore, internal temperatures stay within excellent levels, in the low 70s on both the CPU and GPU with the laptop on the desk.
For the most part, gaming on Silent at QHD with medium/high or FHD with high/ultra settings makes for an excellent experience on this laptop.
Finally, this laptop can also game alright on battery power, where it allocated around 35W to the GPU and nearly matches the performance offered on Silent, with the laptop plugged into the wall. However, don’t expect more than about an hour and a few minutes of gaming time with recent titles.
Noise, Heat, Connectivity, speakers, and others The thermal design of the Flow X13 doesn’t seem to have changed from the previous X13 generations. We’re still looing at two fans, three radiators and two heatpipes, with liquid metal compound applied on the CPU, and regular thermal paste on the GPU.
Here’s the cooling on this ROG Flow X13 chassis.
And here’s the cooling on the 2022 model.
But somehow, the two generations performs completely differently.
Not only is the newer model a higher power implementation, it also allows the components to run at lower power. And that’s both with the laptop sitting flat on the desk, or when having it on a raiser stand in order to improve cooling.
That’s because this design still chocks the airflow underneath the laptop when having it on a flat surface. But somehow, the overall experience is significantly improved between generations. I’m not sure how they’ve done it, aside from redesigning the rubber feet on the underbelly and replacing them with a slightly bigger one at the back. But there’s still hardly any space underneath the laptop with this change. Maybe there’s something I’m missing about this thermal design? Maybe is the new hardware that simply runs cooler in this package. Let me know in the comments section.
As far as external temperatures go, a hotspot develops on all profiles in the middle-top part of the laptop, over the components. This hotspot reaches temperatures in the 50s and even close to 60s on Turbo mode, with the laptop on a stand. Somehow, despite the lower internal temperatures in that mode, the chassis actually heats-up more around the components.
That’s surely uncomfortably high, but the good news is that you’ll hardly touch the area that gets that hot with most games, as it’s around the 7 8 U keys. The regions around the WASD and Arrows keys stay in the mid to high 30s on all profiles, so in actual use, this laptop arely felt hot to the touch. Having a plastic inner body helps here as well, as plastic doesn’t dissipate heat the same way as metal does.
*Gaming – Turbo mode – playing Witcher 3 for 30 minutes, fans at ~44 dB *Gaming – Turbo mode, raised back – playing Witcher 3 for 30 minutes, fans at ~45 dB
With daily use, the external temperatures are fine, and yet still a little warm in the same place in the middle of the chassis. The fans keep idle with light tasks on the Silent profile, but only with very light activities. With daily use and multitasking, they’re active, albeit at slow speeds and sub 30 dBA noise levels. So you’re hear them in a quiet environment, but they won’t bother you in a regular setup.
That aside, I also haven’t noticed any coil whine or electronic noises on my unit. Make sure to listen for any regularities on our sample, though.
*Daily Use – streaming Netflix in EDGE for 30 minutes, Silent Mode, fans at 0-30 dB
For connectivity, there’s the latest-gen WiFi 6E and Bluetooth 5 through a Mediatek module on this laptop. It performed well with our setup. I didn’t notice any issues or disconnects during our tests, nor a significant drop in performance at longer distances.
Audio is handled by a set of stereo speakers that fire through grills placed on the bottom of the laptop. However, due to how the bottom is angled towards the sides, they’re quite difficult to cover up and muffle. The sound quality is fine for an ultraportable gaming laptop chassis, but lacks in bass and somehow the volume is not as loud as I remember from the previous generations. I only measured about 70 dBA max on this generation.
I also mentioned some vibrations in the keyboard deck and arm-rest at high volumes, but not as much as with the previous design.
Finally, I’ll also mention that there’s a FHD camera placed at the top of the screen, flanked by microphones. It’s alright in good light and with a wide-angle lens, but grainy in dimmer light. It also supports IR for Windows Hello, as this generation no longer implements a finger sensor on the power button.
Battery life There’s a 76 Wh battery inside this Asus Flow X13 generation, an excellent size for a 13-inch laptop.
Here’s what we got in terms of runtimes, with the system set on Silent, Standard dGPU and the screen’s brightness at around 50% (120 nits)
9 W (~8 h of use) – text editing in Google Drive, Silent Mode, screen at 50%, Wi-Fi ON;8 W (~9 h of use) – 1080p fullscreen video on Youtube in Edge, Silent Mode, screen at 50%, Wi-Fi ON;9 W (~8 h of use) – 4K fullscreen video on Youtube in Edge, Silent Mode, screen at 50%, Wi-Fi ON;10.5 W (~7 h of use) – Netflix 4K HDR fullscreen in Edge, Silent Mode, screen at 50%, Wi-Fi ON;12 W (~4-6 h of use) – browsing in Edge, Silent Mode, screen at 50%, Wi-Fi ON;55 W (~1 h 15 min of use) – Gaming on Performance mode, Witcher 3, screen at 50%, Wi-Fi ON.
These are good runtimes, but not quite enough for a full day of work. So you’ll need to bring along the charger. Configurations with the FHD+ display might run for a little longer, though.
The system automatically switches the screen to 60 Hz on battery mode.
For comparison, here’s how long previous-generation Flow X13 lasted in the same tests, in the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS + Nvidia RTX 3050 Ti GPU configuration and FHD screen.
7 W (~8-9 h of use) – text editing in Google Drive, Silent Mode, screen at 50%, Wi-Fi ON;6 W (~10 h of use) – 1080p fullscreen video on Youtube in Edge, Silent Mode, screen at 50%, Wi-Fi ON;5.8 W (~10-11 h of use) – Netflix fullscreen in Edge, Silent Mode, screen at 50%, Wi-Fi ON;10 W (~6-7 h of use) – browsing in Edge, Silent Mode, screen at 50%, Wi-Fi ON;62 W (~1 h of use) – Gaming on Performance mode, Witcher 3, screen at 50%, Wi-Fi ON.
This ran more efficiently, especially with video streaming and light use. Thus, even with the bigger battery in this model, the previous generation still offered longer battery life on a charge.
The laptop ships with a mid-sized 130W USB-C charger, higher capacity than the 100W charger in the previous generation. It’s a standard dual-piece design with two long cables and plugs in via USB-C, in either of the left or right side ports.
Charging with a 3rd party adapter It’s important to mention that this computer only allows for the Turbo/Manual power modes with this official ROG charger, and other USB-C chargers would be deemed non-compliant and only allow for the Performance and Silent profiles, even if they are higher-capacity than 130W. This is a small detail to be aware of if you already own a GAN charger that you might want to keep using with this laptop.
With a 67W MacBook charger that I had around, for instance, on the Performance profile, we measured 35W sustained power in Cinebench, and ~55W (12W CPU + 43W GPU) in Witcher 3. The battery also seems to very slowly discharge when connected to this sort of charger, and it might discharge even faster with a lower capacity adapter.
These results should be similar if you plan on using an external USB-C power bank with the Flow X13. But again, if you plan on running demanding loads in this way, you’ll have to chose one that provides good output power (above 65W if possible – not sure if that’s even an option, though). I don’t have such as power bank to try out
At the same time, keep in mind that these findings might vary between 3rd party chargers, and especially with higher power chargers over 100W. Head over to the comments section for more details.
Price and availability- Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302 The Asus ROG Flow X13 is listed in most regions at the time of this article, and the GV302 is the latest model available as of the first part of 2024.
This Flow X13 GV302XV configuration tested here, with the Ryzen 9 processor, RTX 4060 dGPU, 16 GB of RAM, 1TB SSD, and the QHD+ display is not as widespread, though. It’s available here in eastern Europe for 2000 EUR, but hardly anywhere else.
The Flow X13 GV302XU RTX 4050 configuration, with otherwise similar specs, goes for $1799 in the US and around 1900 EUR over here.
The top-tier Flow X13 GV302XI RTX 4070 model with 32 GB of RAM seems to be the most widely available, going for $2499 in the US and 3000 EUR over here. That’s steep for more or less 10% in extra graphics performance and the extra RAM.
Finally, a base-level Flow X13 GV302XA version without a dGPU, with the FHD+ display and with 16 GB ram/512 GB of storage, is also available in some regions, but is hard to find in stock. In the US, that goes for $1250, while over here it goes for around 1400-1500 EUR.
Overall, this generation demands a premium over the previous X13 models. Furthermore, previous gen Flow X13 configurations are still available in stores, with hefty discounts, so if you’re after this format in a more affordable bundle, there might be a good deal waiting for you with those.
We’ll update if needed. In the meantime, follow this link for updated configurations and prices in your region , at the time you’re reading the article.
Final thoughts- Asus ROG Flow X13 review Having spent the last months with this Flow X13 generation, my conclusion of the previous X13 generation hasn’t changed much: as an all-purpose compact laptop, this Flow X13 is still unmatched by any other device available out there today.
Sure, the Asus ROG Flow Z13 is a little more powerful in sustained loads, and even notably more capable in certain professionals applications that might matter to some of you, but for most people, the configurations on the X13 should be fast enough. Plus, the AMD powered X13 remains more efficient on battery power, even if this implementation sips a little more power than the past models. The new 75 Wh battery helps compensate for it, and trumps the 56 Wh battery on the tablet Flow model.
Other than that, I simply much prefer the versatile gaming 2-in-1 convertible form factor the Flow X13, which makes it an excellent everyday laptop, but with the ability to convert when needed. I expect most people to primarily want to use these devices as laptops anyway.
Gen over gen, this X13 gets a massive boost in performance, an improvement in thermals and overall behaviour when keeping it flat on a desk, updated inputs and IO, and a QHD+ display option that makes a lot more sense that the UHD model in a 13-inch format.
At the same time, you’ll still have to be aware of the hot chassis temperatures that build on this device with sustained loads, and perhaps the fact that the speakers aren’t that great compared to what else you can find out there on modern ultrabooks.
Finally, you’ll have to consider the pricing that Asus asks for this generation, which gets quite steep for the top model. Unfortunately, the GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU configuration seems to be the only one available with 32 GB of RAM, so if you want to futureproof your buy, you’ll be forced to get that one. This aspect could put potential buyers on the fence, and I think having 32 GB on the 4060 model would have been a plus. But it is what it is.
Anyway, this wraps up our review of the Asus ROG Flow X13 2023/2024 generation, and I’d love to hear your thoughts, questions, and feedback down below.
Disclaimer: Our content is reader-supported. If you buy through some of the links on our site, we may earn a commission.
Terms .
Navigation: Ultrabookreview.com » Asus
Review by: Andrei Girbea
Andrei Girbea is a Writer and Editor-in-Chief here at Ultrabookreview.com . I write about mobile technology, laptops and computers in general. I've been doing it for more than 15 years now. I'm a techie with a Bachelor's in Computer Engineering. I mostly write reviews and thorough guides here on the site, with some occasional columns and first-impression articles.
YESHY
September 15, 2023 at 7:03 pm
FINALLY THANK YOU
I haven't read yet, but my major gripe is that the screen isn't HDR / special (I have the 4070 version).
(Also there's no 60W 4080 option, if throttled 80W 4090 is unrealistic, since they have to upsell their eGPU)
Nelson
September 16, 2023 at 4:26 am
Amazing review, quality is unparalleled. I've followed you through the years and reviews just get better!
Can you say more about charing with third party adapter?
1. Is there pass-through or does it cycle around the battery limi like the g14?
2. Does the battery discharge while gaming? On reddit people tried 100w adapter and it discharges. 2022 model was 65w limited this is 100w limited
3. Does it matter which of the two usb c poets you use?
Is the screen really glossy and it annoys you? I personally prefer screens like the g14
Andrei Girbea
September 17, 2023 at 3:12 pm
With the main charger:
1. as far as I can tell, there is pass-through, since this is primarily designed to pe powered by USB-C. Not sure how exactly I can check this, but I'm not seeing battery discharge with daily use
2. I'll have to double check once I get the time, I haven't specifically looked into it.
3. No, both USb-C ports can be used for charging.
I haven't checked the power settings with a 3rd party charger. I'll have to look into it, once I get the time (not sure exactly when at this point)
The screen is glossy, that's a given with touchscreens.
Raymond C
September 18, 2023 at 4:41 pm
About the power pass-through, from what I have read, you can do it this way.
1. Set a battery limit through MyAsus or third-party apps such as G-helper (I guess for a benchmark, you might want to use Asus original apps). IIRC MyAsus only lets you set it to 80%, but G-helper can set a value between 40% and 80%.
2. After you reach the threshold, use monitoring apps to read the battery discharge rate while using the laptop. If it's 0, that means the DC pass-through is working.
AFAIK, the G14 Zephyrus definitely has a power pass-through if you use the barrel charger, but no pass-through through the USB-C charger.
Nelson
September 19, 2023 at 12:25 am
Amazing thanks. It's sad to know it drains while gaming. This makes the point of third party usb c charging laprop …again useless. I blew my battery with the g14 using a USB c because I didn't know it was charger and discharging around the limit, now this one will discharge while gaming. Isn't the whole point of having USB c charging as being able to use any charger instead of having to bring the brick around?
Andrei is the discharge present on both ports? Thanks!
Andrei Girbea
September 19, 2023 at 11:02 am
I only tested on the one on the left in (the XG Mobile port). BUT, there's no discharge with the main power supply that comes with the laptop. So why is it that important for you to use a 3rd party charger?
Andrei Girbea
September 18, 2023 at 2:26 pm
Hi. I've added an update on using a 3rd party charger. It's at the end of the Battery life section.
Jose
September 18, 2023 at 8:34 pm
I tested with fairly good 100w usb-c adapter, it can take 100w from 3rd party adapters, which is much better than the previous limit of 65w
Andrei Girbea
September 19, 2023 at 11:01 am
Interesting. I got different results with a MacBook Pro USB-C 67W charger.
Edited: My initial reply erroneously claimed different results with a 135W MacBook charger. However, I actually tested my unit with a 67W Apple charger, so getting higher power with a more powerful charger makes sense.
JSA
September 24, 2023 at 7:38 am
Here is example. It was drawing 90-100w in heavier loads
Andrei Girbea
September 24, 2023 at 10:42 am
Thank you! I double checked and I must apologize for a mistake that I made in my previous comment.
I was stating that I tested this with a 135W Apple charger, but in fact, the tests were performed with a 67W MacBook Pro 13 charger. Hence. the lower power draw in our findings.
At this point, I don't have a higher power USB-C 3rdparty charger to perform other tests.
Jose
September 24, 2023 at 7:39 am
https://github-production-user-asset-6210df.s3.amazonaws.com/58001986/270146753-a411abdd-791f-4d9d-83d3-c53d0f2a99de.png
Joosua Santasalo
September 17, 2023 at 6:59 am
Thx for the review!
The X13 32gb model is actually available at 2499€ for Nordics. Got one from Asus directly.
Great performer, and I am quite sure, that it could match the battery life of 2022 model with further updates. The increased performance seems to have reduced the efficiency by 15-20%, but compared to previous gen, this thing most certainly feels bit snappier in various loads
tomas
September 19, 2023 at 2:04 pm
HEY ANDREI,1-do you recommend this laptop for premier pro and adobe photoshop in real world usage?
2-general question:do you have any advice for laptop high idle power consumption?(for more battery life)
Andrei Girbea
September 21, 2023 at 10:54 am
Generally, yes, but it depends. If a 13-inch laptop is a must, then yes, this X13 and the Intel-based Z13 are your best bets. I'd say the Intel model is a little better suited for Adobe software. You'll find Puget benchmarks in both reviews, for comparison.
If you're fine a a 14-inch device, there are other options to consider as well.
Your 2nd question is complex. I'd try to minimize installed software and everything running in the background, use the lower power profile available, lower the screen brightness, etc. You'll have to adapt to each situation and understand what's causing the high power at idle
RoFoz
October 5, 2023 at 9:11 am
Thank you for this superb review, which covers in detail the subtle (and not-so-subtle) differences between models. Really helpful and clear.
bittricks
October 8, 2023 at 6:59 am
I purchased the first version of this laptop with the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS back in mid 2021.
Except for the rubber "pips" at the front corners of the palm deck falling out and the plastic palm deck itself, this model has been great.
If the rubber pips fall out, you can send the unit to ASUS under warranty for a palm deck replacement. If it is beyond warranty, OEM palm decks were available directly from ASUS – it was just that they were out of stock for a long while.
I set the power mode to Manual and the thing is a real performer given its form factor. I could multi-task with office productivity apps while simultaneously running a few virtual machines in Hyper-V, all without any noticeable issues caused by lack of hardware or memory resources.
If I needed to upgrade to the latest version of this model, I would not hesitate to make the purchase. I'd just wait for it to go on sale.
bittricks
October 31, 2023 at 6:12 am
Caveat Emptor
The build quality of the palm deck remains an issue.
1. The front standoff pips (front corner of palm deck) and rear standoff strips (in front of each hinge) are just rubber held in-place with adhesive. The adhesive is weak and both types of pips fall out if the device owner is not delicate when cleaning the palm deck or constantly puts pressure on the front pips with their wrists. Just a little bit of repetitive rubbing on the front pips causes them to fall out.
1.1 If either falls out, the screen contacts the keys and oil outlines or scratches will result on the screen.
1.2 This is a known issue (ASUS knows all about it) continuing on from the original version released in 2021. Despite this fact, getting a replacement palm deck can be a challenge even if under warranty because ASUS' palm deck suppliers have frequently been out-of-stock.
1.3 ASUS does not provide replacement pips & strips; the user only has two options: either replace the entire palm deck or try to reattach the standoff pips (I tried something like 10 or different adhesives – spent over $100 USD – but the rubber pips never did stick).
1.4 I tried to find a replacement palm deck, but the only I could find was through ASUS – which required jumping through hoops because the warranty administrative staff did not even know what I was talking about when I started the warranty process.
2. The palm deck is still plastic that wears quickly where the hands\wrists are placed on the deck resulting in smooth, shiny sections of plastic.
Other than that, it is still a beast of a little system. I have the original 2021 version. At this point the palm deck is beat. I just purchased the new version and the left front pip and the right rear strip already came detached from the adhesive and fell out. This is the same thing that happened on the 2021 version, but much quicker.
Because a fix is such a challenge, I have resolved to not purchase another Flow X13 until ASUS changes the palm deck design – which is unlikely to happen. It's a shame actually. Exceptional capacity relative to size. There truly is no 13 inch equal on the market that I am aware of except for the Z13.
If somebody needs a 13 inch powerhouse, then I strongly advise them to choose the Z13 if they can live with the quirky ergonomics.
bittricks
December 31, 2023 at 10:08 am
I forgot to add that Armoury Crate is massive bloatware that is, except for the power configuration, entirely unneeded and unnecessary on this system. There are no RGB color capabilities on the Flow X13.
Over the prior year, Armoury Crate updates have caused a slew of serious issue after serious issue.
One can choose to remove Armoury Crate and replace it with G-Helper, but from the little bit of testing of G-Helper that I did on my 2 X13s, I am not confident that the power configuration works the same as the one in Armoury Crate. G-Helper enthusiasts and regular users of it insist that it works just the same as the power profiles for X13 in Armoury Crate.
Given the cheap palm deck that wears quickly, the rubber pips that fall out and cannot be replaced, and the issues with Armoury Crate I've experienced over the prior 12 months across multiple ASUS systems (2 Flow X13s, and a tower PC system) I have made up my mind not to purchase another ASUS system.
Shame really, but these sorts of issues are deal breakers when you pay a premium price but then get basically no viable support options.