This is my detailed review of the Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 series, the most powerful mid-sized Republic of Gamers laptop available as of 2023/2024.
We’ve already reviewed the bigger 18-inch ROG Scar 18 , with whom this 16-inch Scar 16 model shares most of its characteristics and features. This way, we can properly discuss the advantages and the drawbacks of opting for either size.
Our review unit is a powerful configuration with the Intel Core i9-13980HX processor, Nvidia RTX 4080 Laptop 175W dGPU, and a mini LED display. You can also opt for the 4090 on this series, if your budget allows it, and we’ll discuss the performance differences between the two GPUs in the article.
Update: As of early 2024, there’s an updated generation of the Strix Scar 16 , built on a Raptor Lake Refresh Core i9-14900HX processor, faster DDR5-5600 default RAM, and the same RTX 4080/4090 graphics chips. Since the two generations are nearly identical in most ways, this article still applies to both. I will update with links to our dedicated review of the 2024 Scar 16 model if we get to test it, and in the meantime, you should go over our review of the 2023 ROG Scar 18 model .
Specs-wise, the two ROG Scars are identical, with the same Core i9 HX processor, GPUs, RAM, storage, batteries, etc. They also share a similar tri-fan cooling module with ample radiators, a major update from the thermal modules of the past Scar generations , but the bigger Scar 18 has a slight advantage in cooling due to its extra size that allows for larger heatpipes and a larger fan on the GPU side.
The Scar 16 compensates by being more compact and lighter (2.5 Kg vs 3.1 kg), which make it a more versatile laptop format for those of you who need to get your computer to work or school every other day. It also offers a beautiful mini LED display with HDR support, an option not available on the Scar 18, and a more minimalist keyboard layout. Mostly everything else is identical between the two, though.
With that in mind, down below I’ve gathered my thoughts and impressions on this Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 series, with a close look at all the details that you should be aware of as a potential buyer. For the time being, this review is still a work in progress, and I’ll update the gaming/thermal/noise findings at some point in the near future, as for the time being I only got to spend limited time with this unit, and could not properly run all those tests.
Specs sheet as reviewed – Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634
ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 16 G634JZ
Display 16-inch, 16:10, non-touch, matte,Nebula HDR QHD+ 2560 x 1600 px, miniLED 1024 zones, 240 Hz 3ms, up to 1100 nits HDR, 100% DCI-P3 QHD+ IPS 500-nits with 100% DCI-P3 option also available
Processor Intel 13th gen Raptor Lake, Core i9-13980HX, 8C+16c/32T – on the 2023 generation
Video Intel UHD + Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop 12GB (up to 175W with Dynamic Boost) with MUX, Advanced Optimus, GSync
Memory 32 GB DDR5-4800 RAM – up to 64 GB (2x DIMMs) on the 2023 generation
Storage 2TB SSD (Samsung PM9A1 drive) – 2x M.2 PCI 4.0 x4 slots
Connectivity WiFi 6E (Intel AX211) 2×2 with Bluetooth 5.2, 2.5Gigabit LAN
Ports Left: power, 2.5G Lan, 1x USB-C with Thunderbolt 4, 1x USB-C gen2 (with video, data, power), HDMI 2.1 FRL, headphone&mic
Battery 90Wh, 330 W power adapter + 100W USB-C charger, USB-C charging up to 100W
Size 354 mm or 13.94” (w) x 264 mm or 10.4″ (d) x 22.6 – 30.4 mm or .89″ – 1.2” (h)
Weight 2.48 kg (5.47 lbs),
Extras rubber-dome per-key RGB backlit keyboard without NumPad, updated touchpad with NumberPad, HD camera, quad speakers, updated tri-fan cooling module
This SCAR 16 G634JZ (i9 + RTX 4080) is actually the lower-specced configuration available with the ROG Scar 16 series, the other one being the SCAR 16 G634JY (i9 + RTX 4090).
Mid-tier and lower-tier specs (4050 to 4070 GPUs) are not available for the Scar lineup, but are offered on the ROG Strix G16 series discussed here . We’ll also cover those models in future reviews.
Design and construction The ROG Strix Scar 16 is a mid-sized full-performance laptop that doesn’t aim to be compact or thin or lightweight, but instead aims at maximizing the performance and cooling capabilities possible in a 16-inch chassis.
Hence, it’s roughly 355 x 265 x 30 mm in size, and weighs just a little under 2.5 kg (5.5 lbs). For comparison, that’s more or less the same size as other popular 16-inch performance laptops such as the Lenovo Legion Pro 7 or the MSI Raider GE68 , and a little bigger and heavier than the previous Scar 15 generation from 2022. It’s also quite a lot smaller than its sibling, the 18-inch ROG Scar 18.
The general design lines of this lineup carry on from the previous variants, though. The main chassis is still made out of plastic, with a smooth finish for the interior and a rougher finish for the edges and the underside, while the lid cover is a solid piece of aluminum, painted in black.
The interior still smudges easily, and the grime and the oils are more difficult to wipe clean than on metal dark surfaces. In comparison, the finishing that Asus offers on their Zephyrus models is just better at this.
At the same time, even with the main chassis being plastic, the build quality is top-notch here, with almost no flex anywhere and no squeaky/creaky noises when using and picking this up.
New for this generation is the gradually translucent inner deck, allowing to peek inside at the components in the upper part of the chassis, as well as the simplified branding on the lid. Asus also revamped the RGB lighting, with a light bar on the front and the back of the laptop, and an RGB logo on the lid, all independently controllable in the software.
However, the major updates change of this generation are the display and around the rear side. The display is now 16 inches in diagonal and 16:10 format, so bigger and taller than in the past, and with smaller bezels as well. As for the rear of the laptop, this is now entirely reserved for cooling. In fact, this back edge and a big part of the left and right edges are reserved for radiators, in order to accommodate the updated internal cooling module and the higher-power implemented components.
As a result, though, the IO is now entirely placed on the sides, and mostly on the left edge. That means the PSU and the main connectors are no longer tucked away behind the display.
On that left part, you’ll find the power plug, the LAN port, the full-size HDMI 2.1 FRL, and the two USB-C ports. One of them supports Thunderbolt 4 with 40 Gbps USB, no charging, and DP through the iGPU, and the other is a regular USB-C 3.2 with 10 Gbps USB, 100W charging, and DP through the dGPU. On the right, there are two USB-A slots.
There’s still no card reader on this Scar series, and no Lock of any kind. But at least they gave up on that useless KeyStone occupying space on the right edge.
I’ll also add that this Scar generation still implements a system of 4x speakers (two under the screen, two on the bottom) and no biometrics: no IR camera and no finger sensor.
As far as ergonomics go, I like the blunted edges and corners on this design, the strong hinges that allow easy one-handed adjustments, and the excellent grip provided by the big rubber feet.
But there are also some less-fortunate aspects of this notebook. For instance, the screen only leans back to about 135 degrees, which is rather limiting for non-desk use.
I also resent the way Asus implements the status LEDs, with big indicators positioned right under the display, in the line of sight, and constantly blinking. They’re just extremely annoying when using the laptop at night, watching a movie, or even playing games. If I were to buy this, I’d try to dim them somehow with perhaps a black permanent marker, or ideally, figure out how to disconnect them.
Oh, and there’s still an unnecessary always-on light in the power button. What’s the point of that?
Overall, this 2023/2024 Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 feels and looks much like the Scars of past years, and it’s a fair design in its class. It’s controversial, though, with the smudgy plastics used for the main deck being not quite on par with the metal finishes offered by the competition, with those horribly placed status LEDs, and with the entire back edge being reserved for cooling and pushing all the ports to the sides.
Keyboard and trackpad The keyboard on the Scar 16 is an iteration of the rubber-dome design offered on past ROG full-size models, such as the Scar 15 .
It’s a minimalist layout with a central deck of properly sized and spaced main keys, and without a NumPad section. Instead, there’s an extra column of media keys at the very right side, and five customizable keys positioned separately in the top-left part, as on most other ROG devices.
I would have preferred if those keys in the right column were mapped as PgUp/PgDn/Home/End by default and not as media keys. Instead, that functionality is backed as secondaries to the arrow keys, perhaps to keep it consistent with other ROG laptops.
Speaking of, the arrow keys have been updated on this generation, and are now full-size keys intertwined between the other keys on the lower-right side. I’m not entirely sold on this change over the spaced-out smaller arrows implemented in the past design, but I guess full-size arrows make more sense on such a gaming computer.
The typing experience hasn’t changed in any notable way from the previous laptops, and that’s alright. This is a good keyboard with average stroke depth and good overall feedback. No complaints here.
The keys are RGB backlit, with per-key control and various effects selectable in Armoury Crate and the Aura Creator app. The LEDs are bright enough and uniform, with some light creeping from underneath the keycaps, but not in a very annoying way.
However, the F1-F12 writing on the top keys is still not backlit, making these keys difficult to figure out in the dark. This has been an issue on many ROG lineups over the years, and I don’t understand why they haven’t addressed it by now.
For mouse, the taller format of this 16-inch chassis allowed Asus to implement a taller glass clickpad than in the past. I don’t mind it at all. The surface is spacious and smooth to the touch, and the physical clicks are smooth and quiet. The surface still rattles with firmer taps, though, so tap it gently.
Furthermore, to mitigate the lack of a dedicated NumPad section, this clickpad doubles up as a virtual NumberPad. It’s not quite the same as pressing actual keys, but some of you will find it a helpful addition.
As for biometrics, there are still none on this ROG Strix Scar 16.
Screen There’s a 16-inch 16:10 matte display on the ROG Strix Scar 16 series, with either an IPS or a mini LED panel option.
We have the mini LED on our sample, which seems to be the most widespread of the two. This miniLED panel is branded as “ROG Nebula HDR” on Asus laptops, and it’s the same panel from BOE that Asus also offer on the Zephyrus M16 and the Flow X16 models.
This comes with a dense array of 1024 dimming zones, 900+ nits of peak SDR brightness (in multi-zone mode, as per our tests), and 1100+ nits of peak HDR brightness. It’s one of the most versatile laptop screens available out there, with 100% DCI-P3 color coverage, high peak brightness, and excellent blacks and contrast with zone-dimming enabled. This is also a matte non-glare finish, so well suited for outdoor or bright office space use.
Update: For what is worth, the 2024 Scar 16 gets a refined iteration of this mini LED panel, with a denser array of 2048 dimming zones and better control over blooming/artefacts on solid colors.
Furthermore, this panel is 240Hz refresh with fast response times (3-7 ms GtG), both must-have features on a modern gaming laptop – it’s not quite as fast as a standard IPS panel of this generation, though, due to the technical particularities of the mini LED technology. On top of these, GSync is supported on the main display with the ROG laptops, for smooth images without any tearing in games.
As another particularity for ROG laptops with mini LED displays, there’s an option in Armoury Crate to select between single-zone and multi-zone panel backlighting. Single-zone disables the zone-dimming functionality and allows this panel to perform as a uniformly-lit IPS display. This mode is designed to offer uniform and accurate image reproduction, without any of the glowing or dynamic processing that results when zone dimming is enabled; it is useful for color-accurate work, such as editing images or videos. However, the peak brightness, the blacks, and the contrast aren’t that great in this setting.
Here’s what we got in our tests of this panel with single-zone lighting, with an X-Rite i1 Display Pro sensor :
Panel HardwareID: BOE BOE0B74 (NE160QDM-NM4);
Coverage: 99.8% sRGB, 88.6% AdobeRGB, 98.7% DCI-P3;
Type: 10-bit HDR, with Dolby Vision support;
Measured gamma: 2.21;
Max brightness in the middle of the screen: 500.19 cd/m2 on power;
Min brightness in the middle of the screen: 54.24 cd/m2 on power;
Contrast at max brightness: 1119:1;
White point: 6700 K;
Black on max brightness: 0.44 cd/m2;
PWM: No.
The panel comes well pre-calibrated out of the box, with a Pantone certification, and there’s little to improve on the Gamma and White Point from the default profile. We also measured good luminosity and color uniformity levels on our sample. However, some light bleeding was visible in this mode on dark backgrounds. At the same time, activating the multi-zone mode nullifies this issue, as shown in the above image.
I’ll also add that the lowest-brightness setting isn’t very dim on this panel, at 50+ nits, and this aspect might bother those of you who are using the laptop in a pitch-dark room.
Activating multi-zone lighting in Armoury Crate pushes the SDR peak brightness in the middle of the screen to around 900-nits, with dark blacks and nearly infinite contrast.
At the same time, the color and brightness uniformity take a hit, as they are impacted by the zone-dimming functionality, and blooming/glowing and uniformity artifacts are visible in some situations, as explained in this dedicated article about the mini LED laptop display technology . Thus, I wouldn’t recommend this multi-zone setting for any sort of professional color work, but I’d keep it selected for daily use, watching movies, or playing games (especially those with good HDR support, at least).
Furthermore, I’d also set the display on HDR mode in Windows, which automatically enables multi-zone lighting and further enhances the image quality and brightness in supported content.
Here’s what we got in our tests of this panel in the multi-zone lighting mode, with an X-Rite i1 Display Pro sensor :
Measured gamma: 2.55;
Max brightness in the middle of the screen: 908.04 cd/m2 on power;
Min brightness in the middle of the screen: 84.11 cd/m2 on power;
Contrast at max brightness: 27000:1;
White point: 6700 K;
Black on max brightness: 0.03 cd/m2;
PWM: No.
Attempting to calibrate the display on this multi-zone mode doesn’t fix the recorded imbalances in gamma, white point, and DeltaE color accuracy. Thus, I wouldn’t use this mode for color-accurate work, as previously explained.
All in all, this is a versatile display, capable of accurate content reproduction and rich color volume in the single-zone mode, as well as beautiful images on multi-zone, with better black and deeper contrast than the regular IPS panel options, as well as higher brightness and better reflection handling than on an OLED variant . You’ll want to understand the particularities of this mini LED display technology on laptops , though, just to make sure this is the right option for you or not. For me, this is the best jack-of-all-trades panel available on gaming laptops as of 2023.
As far as the IPS option goes, it’s the 16-inch BOE QHD+ panel with ~500 nits of brightness, 1200:1 contrast, and 100% DCI-P3 color coverage that Asus offers on most of their ROG series, such as the Strix G16 or the Zephyrus G16 . You’ll find more about it by following those links.
Hardware and performance Our test model is the mid-specced configuration of the Asus ROG Strix Scar 16, code name G634JZ, built on an Intel Core i9-13980HX processor, 32 GB of DDR5-4800 memory in dual channel, 2 TB of fast SSD storage, and dual graphics: the Nvidia RTX 4080 12GB dGPU and the Iris UHD iGPU integrated within the Intel processor.
Before we proceed, keep in mind that our review unit was sent over by Asus and it runs on the early software available as of late-February 2023 (BIOS 304, Armoury Crate 5.4.8, GeForce 528.49 drivers). The gaming performance and some of the benchmarks were again retested with the updated drivers available as of late-April 2023 (BIOS 309, Armoury Crate 5.4.10, GeForce 531.79 drivers). Some aspects might change with later software.
Update: The 2024 Scar 16 updates ship with an Intel Core i9-14900HX processor and DDR5-5600 memory by default, as well as more mature software. However, the overall performance of the two generations is within a few percent (margin of error), as shown in our review of the 2024 Scar 18 over here .
Spec-wise, this 2023 ASUS Strix ROG Scar 16 is built on the latest Intel and Nvidia hardware available to date.
The Core i9-13980HX is the top mobile processor in Intel’s Raptor Lake 13th-gen platform , with 24 Cores and 32 Threads. It is a hybrid design with 8 High-Performance and dual-threaded Cores, and 16 extra Efficiency cores, which work together or separately in the various loads. The design and thermal module of this Scar allow the processor to run at ~135-150W of sustained power in demanding CPU loads, on the Turbo or Manual profiles.
For the GPU, the Scar 16 series is available with top-tier RTX 4000 chips. What we have on this sample is the RTX 4080 Laptop dGPU running at up to 175W with Dynamic Boost, and you can also spec this series with an RTX 4090 175W. Asus bumped the GPU’s power settings from the previous Scar generations, which was only up to 150W on the Scar 15.
There’s still a MUX on this design, for uncompromised gaming performance, but new for the year is support for Nvidia’s Advanced Optimus technology and GSync on the main display. Advanced Optimus seems to work as it should here, with the exception that the system freezes for 1-2 seconds when switching between GPU modes.
As for the RAM and storage options, the laptop still comes with two accessible memory DIMMs and two M.2 SSD slots. Our unit shipped with 32 GB of DDR5-4800 RAM in dual-channel and a single 2TB gen4 Samsung SSD.
Getting inside to the components required you to pop up the back panel, held in place by a couple of Philips screws, with the one in the lower-right corner being a pop-up screw. Careful, these screws are of different lengths, so make sure you put them back the right way.
The light bar on the front edge of the laptop is no longer integrated into the D-Panel, as on the previous generation, which means you can easily lift up the panel without any concern.
Inside you’ll find all the components, the big battery, and the thermal module. Everything is packed up tightly inside this 16-inch model, and the cooling is a little more compact than on the 18-inch chassis on the GPU side, with a smaller fan and shorter heatpipes, as shown in one of the following images.
Specs aside, Asus offer their standard power profiles in the Armoury Crate control app: Silent, Performance, Turbo, and Manual, with various power settings and fan profiles between them, summarized in the following table.
Silent Performance Turbo Manual
CPU only, PL1/PL2 TDP
65/100W
90/120W
135/175W
140/175W
GPU only, max TGP
55W
160W
175W
175W
Crossload
85W, 30 + 55 W
195W, 45 + 150 W
230W, 55 + 175 W
240W, 65 + 175 W
Noise at head-level, tested
35 dBA
~42-43 dBA in games
~50 dBA
~52 dBA, max fans
These are the same power profiles as on the Scar 18, but the fans run a little quieter at max rpms on Manual mode (52 dBA vs 53 dBA), most likely because the GPU fan is smaller on this 16-inch model.
Aside from these main power profiles, there are also some GPU options to choose from: Ultimate (dGPU only, requires a restart when selected), Standard (enables Advanced Optimus), Optimized (enables regular Optimus), and Eco (regular Optimus, but disables the dGPU). I mostly kept the laptop on Standard for daily use and tests, and opted for Ultimate for gaming.
Before we jump to the performance section, here’s how this laptop handles everyday use and multitasking on the Silent profile, unplugged from the wall. For what is worth, the fans keep mostly idle on this Silent mode with casual use, as the 0DB technology keeps the fans inactive most of time, as a result of the CPU/GPU staying under 60 degrees C.
Performance and benchmarks On to more demanding loads, we start by testing the CPU’s performance by running the Cinebench R15 test for 15+ times in a loop, with a 1-2 seconds delay between each run.
The Core i9 processor stabilizes at ~150W of sustained power on the Turbo setting, with temperatures of around 95 C and scores of ~4800 points. The fans spin at ~50 dB at head level in this mode.
The CPU runs at high power for the entire duration of this test, but gets slightly thermally limited after a few runs.
Voltage control is locked with both XTU and Throttlestop, but there is an undervolting option in the BIOS that allows for up to a -30 mV undervolt. With the undervolt, the CPU scores 2-3 higher than on stock Turbo. I haven’t noticed any stability issues on this -30 mV undervolt during my time with this laptop – never got a blue screen or any crashes in any applications.
There’s also the option of using the Manual profile and bumping the fans to 100% rpms. With the fans at max and the back of the laptop raised up to facilitate better airflow into the fans, this mode translates into a minimal noise increase (52 dBA) and a 2-3% increase in scores over the standard Turbo mode. However, the CPU is no longer power-limited in this mode, and runs at ~90 degrees Celsius.
Switching over to the Performance profile translates in the CPU stabilizing at ~100W and temperatures in the low-80s, with the fans spinning quieter at ~42 dB at head-level. The system power limits the CPU on this profile, and the performance takes a 10-12% drop from the Turbo profile.
On the Silent profile, the CPU runs at around 90W for a few loops, and then stabilizes around 65W, with barely audible fans (sub 35 dB) and temperatures in the low-80s C. The i9-13980HX scores ~3400 points in the Cinebench test on this profile, which is about 65% of the Turbo performance, and still an excellent score for a laptop platform, as you’ll see in a bit.
Finally, the CPU runs at 35-70 W on battery, on the Performance profile, with scores between 2600 and 3500 points. Details below.
Overall, these are some excellent results compared to any of the other mobile platforms we’ve tested in the past.
However, with the laptop sitting on a flat desk, the i9-13980HX runs ~5 degrees Celsius hotter in this 16-inch chassis than in the larger Scar 18, and that results in a 2-3% drop in sustained performance in this loop test. Bumping the back of the laptop of the desk in order to improve the airflow of cool air into the fans addresses this aspect.
Anyway, here’s how this i9-13980HX implementation fares against a few other platforms available in modern laptops of this year (the few ones we’ve reviewed so far) and the 2022 generation.
We then went ahead and further verified our findings with the more taxing Cinebench R23 loop test and Blender – Classroom, which resulted in similar findings to what we explained above (~140W limit for Turbo, ~100W for Performance, ~65W for Silent).
We also ran the 3DMark CPU test on the Turbo and Turbo UV profiles.
Finally, we ran our combined CPU+GPU stress tests on this notebook. 3DMark stress runs the same test for 20 times in a loop and looks for performance variation and degradation over time.
This review unit passed the test with both the laptop on the desk and with it on a raiser stand, in order to favor airflow into the fans. The system failed the tests by a slight margin with the laptop flat on the desk, and passed it when we raised the back of the laptop in order to improve the airflow of fresh air into he fans. That means the internals can overheat with longer sustained sessions, slightly impacting the performance, as long as you’re keeping the laptop flat on the desk. We’ll further discuss this in the Gaming section below.
Next, we ran the entire suite of tests and benchmarks, on the Turbo profile with the GPU set on the Standard mode (MUX on Advanced Optimus), and with the screen set at the native QHD+ resolution. The CPU runs on stock voltage for these tests.
I reran the tests on the mature software available around late-April (BIOS 309), several months past the initial launch of this series.
Here’s what we got:
3DMark 13 –CPU profile: -max – 13821, 16 – 10134, 8 – 7648, 4 – 4313, 2 – 2303, 1 – 1169;3DMark 13 – Fire Strike (DX11): 34816 (Graphics – 44401, Physics – 44114, Combined – 11862);3DMark 13 – Port Royal (RTX): 12014;3DMark 13 – Time Spy (DX12): 18550 (Graphics – 18818, CPU – 17169);3DMark 13 – Speed Way (DX12 Ultimate): 4739;Uniengine Superposition – 1080p Extreme: 11353;Uniengine Superposition – 1080p Medium: 34314;Handbrake 1.3.3 (4K to 1080p encode): 82.03 average fps;Handbrake 1.6.1 (4K to 1080p encode): 126.04 average fps;PassMark 10: Rating: 7593 (CPU: 53019, 3D Graphics: 28260, Memory: 3453, Disk Mark: 34590);PCMark 10: 8185 (Essentials – 12214, Productivity – 10375, Digital Content Creation – 11744);GeekBench 5.5.1 64-bit: Single-Core: 2119, Multi-core: 21099;GeekBench 6.0.2 64-bit: Single-Core: 2825, Multi-core: 17237;CineBench R15 (best run): CPU 5066 cb, CPU Single Core 311 cb;CineBench R20 (best run): CPU 12075 cb, CPU Single Core 826 cb;CineBench R23: CPU 31852 cb (best single run), CPU 30044 cb (10 min run), CPU Single Core 2125 cb;x265 HD Benchmark 64-bit: 18.61 s.
And here are some workstation benchmarks, on the same Turbo profile:
Blender 3.01 – BMW scene – CPU Compute: 1m 17s ;Blender 3.01 – BMW scene – GPU Compute: 11.33s (CUDA), 7.37s (Optix);Blender 3.01 – Classroom scene – CPU Compute: 3m 00s;Blender 3.01 – Classroom scene – GPU Compute: 23.58s (CUDA), 14.82s (Optix);Blender 3.41 – BMW scene – CPU Compute: 1m 15s;Blender 3.41 – BMW scene – GPU Compute: 11.21s (CUDA), 6.03 (Optix);Blender 3.41 – Classroom scene – CPU Compute: 3m 06s;Blender 3.41 – Classroom scene – GPU Compute: 21.09s (CUDA), 11.64s (Optix);
Pugetbench – DaVinci Resolve: 1977;Pugetbench – Adobe After Effects: 1231;Pugetbench – Adobe Photoshop: 1265;Pugetbench – Adobe Premiere: 1376;
SPECviewperf 2020 – 3DSMax: 181.88;SPECviewperf 2020 – Catia: 99.48;SPECviewperf 2020 – Creo: 133.90;SPECviewperf 2020 – Energy: 63.15;SPECviewperf 2020 – Maya: 492.89;SPECviewperf 2020 – Medical: 54.56;SPECviewperf 2020 – SNX: 31.26;SPECviewperf 2020 – SW: 382.45.V-Ray Benchmark: CPU – 21723 vsamples, GPU CUDA – 2047 vpaths, GPU RTX – 2722 vpaths;
These are some solid results.
On the CPU side, the Intel i9-13980HX smokes any other tested platform in single and multi-threaded performance, although we haven’t yet tested the Ryzen 9 7000 HX hardware . At the same time, this implementation is on par in performance with the same hardware in bigger laptops such as the ROG Scar 18 or the MSI Titan GT77, as per BIOS 309.
On the GPU side, the RTX 4080 175W in this laptop is about 10-20% slower than the RTX 4090 in the Scar 18 , on-par with the 4080 175W we’ve tested in the MSI Raider GE78 and Alienware m16 , and 5-15% faster than the 4080 175W tested in the Blade 16 . It’s also notably faster than the previous top-tier GPU, the 3080Ti 175W.
Impressive, and even more impressive is the value for the money offered by this i9+ 4080 configuration, in comparison to the more expensive i9 + RTX 4090 variant!
i9 (13th gen) + RTX 4080 vs i9 + RTX 4090/RTX 3080Ti performance Here’s a brief comparison of these results on the i9 + RTX 4080 175W Scar 16 configuration next to the i9+ RTX 4090 175W variant of the 2023 ROG Scar 18 and i9 + RTX 3080Ti 175W configuration in the Lenovo Legion 7i , one of the fastest laptops of the 2022 generation.
i9-12980HX + 4080 175W i9-13980HX + 4090 175W i9-12900HX + 3080Ti 175W
3DMark – Fire Strike 34816 (G – 44401, P – 44114, C – 11862)
36036 (G – 47622, P– 40243, C – 12087)
28606 (G – 32570, P– 31099, C – 14072)
3DMark – Port Royal 12014
13564
8571
3DMark – Time Spy 18550 (Graphics – 18818, CPU – 17169)
20350 (Graphics – 21222, CPU – 16509)
13792 (Graphics – 13576, CPU – 15165)
Uniengine Superposition – 1080p Extreme 11353
12641
8277
CineBench R23 (best run) 31852 cb – multi core,
31664 cb – multi core,
21208 cb – multi core,
Blender 3.01 – Classroom scene – CPU Compute 3m 00s
3m 02s
4m 33s
Blender 3.01 – Classroom scene – GPU Compute 23.58s (CUDA), 14.82s (Optix)
19.68s (CUDA), 13.51s (Optix)
32.3s (CUDA), 19.3s (Optix)
SPECviewperf 2020 – 3DSMax: 181.88
200.05
143.71
SPECviewperf 2020 – Catia: 99.48
112.91
77.69
SPECviewperf 2020 – Maya: 383.45
517.80
340.37
As mentioned earlier, the 4080 is within 80 to 95 % of the performance of the 4090 in these similar designs, and at the same time notably faster than the RTX 3080Ti of the previous generation. However, while the gap is around 30% in benchmarks, it actually dwindles toward 15-20% in professional loads such as Blender, 3DMax, or Maya.
We’ll have another article where we’ll get more in-depth on the performance differences between these platforms.
Turbo Mode vs. Performance, Silent Let’s touch on the Performance and Silent profiles offered in Armoury Crate.
Those Turbo-mode results are mind-blowing, but the laptop runs at up to 50 dBA on the Turbo profile, which is noisy. Thus, if you’re willing to sacrifice the performance to some extent in order to keep the fans quieter, the Performance and Silent profiles should be of interest.
Here’s how this Scar 16 performs on the Performance profile, which limits the fans to around 42 dB at head level.
3DMark 13 – Fire Strike: 29055 (Graphics – 38115, Physics – 34991, Combined – 9567);3DMark 13 – Time Spy: 17203 (Graphics – 17821, CPU – 14378);Uniengine Superposition – 1080p Extreme: 10155;CineBench R20 (best run): CPU 10656 cb, CPU Single Core 811 CB;Blender 3.41 – Classroom scene – CPU Compute: 3m 39s.
The CPU runs at about 80-85% and the GPU at about 85-90% of their capabilities on Turbo mode. Not bad, but keep in mind that the internal components tend to run at higher temperatures as well on this profile.
You can also opt for the Silent profile, in which case the fans won’t go over 35 dB. Here’s what we got in this case:
3DMark 13 – Fire Strike: 24766 (Graphics – 29295, Physics – 30514, Combined – 10142);3DMark 13 – Time Spy: 7867 (Graphics – 7295, CPU – 14179);Uniengine Superposition – 1080p Extreme: 6712;CineBench R20 (best run): CPU 9958 cb, CPU Single Core 788 CB;Blender 3.41 – Classroom scene – CPU Compute: 4m 20s.
Both the CPU and the GPU perform at 60-70% of their capabilities on Turbo, which are excellent results given how quietly the laptop runs.
Gaming performance The ROG Scar 16 is the most powerful mid-sized ROG (Republic of Gamers) laptop of the 2023 generation, and just a tad lower on the ladder than the Scar 18, hence you’ll want to know how it handles modern games.
We tested a couple of different types of games on the various available profiles at QHD+ and FHD+ resolution, all with the MUX set on the Ultimate GPU mode.
Here are the results (as per late-April 2023, on BIOS 309, Geforce 531.79):
Core i9-13980HX QHD+ Turbo, QHD+ Performance, FHD+ Turbo, FHD+ Silent,
Cyberpunk 2077 77 fps (52 fps – 1% low)
71 fps (49 fps – 1% low)
112 fps (72 fps – 1% low)
70 fps (51 fps – 1% low)
Doom Eternal 296 fps (43 fps – 1% low)
258 fps (39 fps – 1% low)
403 fps (42 fps – 1% low)
228 fps (48 fps – 1% low)
Far Cry 6 123 fps (82 fps – 1% low)
116 fps (81 fps – 1% low)
147 fps (103 fps – 1% low)
117 fps (82 fps – 1% low)
Far Cry 5 137 fps (86 fps – 1% low)
134 fps (86 fps – 1% low)
151 fps (96 fps – 1% low)
116 fps (76 fps – 1% low)
Metro Exodus 100 fps (68 fps – 1% low)
–
121 fps (71 fps – 1% low)
–
Red Dead Redemption 2 107 fps (82 fps – 1% low)
101 fps (78 fps – 1% low)
143 fps (108 fps – 1% low)
98 fps (78 fps – 1% low)
Resident Evil 4 133 fps (104 fps – 1% low)
126 fps (96 fps – 1% low)
188 fps (147 fps – 1% low)
98 fps (78 fps – 1% low)
Shadow of Tomb Raider 147 fps (106 fps – 1% low)
131 fps (99 fps – 1% low)
172 fps (116 fps – 1% low)
122 fps (98 fps – 1% low)
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt (v4.03) 134 fps (68 fps – 1% low)
127 fps (64 fps – 1% low)
133 fps (71 fps – 1% low)
106 fps (58 fps – 1% low)
Battlefield V, Cyberpunk, Doom, Witcher 3 – recorded with Fraps/in-game FPS counter in campaign mode;
Far Cry 5, 6, Metro, Red Dead Redemption 2, Tomb Raider – recorded with the included Benchmark utilities;
Red Dead Redemption 2 Optimized profile based on these settings .
Those above are rasterization tests, and here are some results for RTX – Ray Tracing performance, with and without DLSS.
Core i9-13980HX + RTX 4080 Laptop 150-175W QHD+ Turbo, dGPU, on desk FHD+ Turbo, dGPU, on desk
Cyberpunk 2077 38 fps (27 fps – 1% low)
59 fps (41 fps – 1% low)
Cyberpunk 2077 110 fps (62 fps – 1% low)
155 fps (102 fps – 1% low)
Doom Eternal 204 fps (44 fps – 1% low)
289 fps (50 fps – 1% low)
Doom Eternal 240 fps (44 fps – 1% low)
328 fps (48 fps – 1% low)
Far Cry 6 103 fps (78 fps – 1% low)
107 fps (82 fps – 1% low)
Shadow of Tomb Raider 94 fps (47 fps – 1% low)
121 fps (66 fps – 1% low)
Shadow of Tomb Raider 114 fps (62 fps – 1% low)
127 fps (70 fps – 1% low)
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt (v4.03 update) 73 fps (47 fps – 1% low)
82 fps (50 fps – 1% low)
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt (v4.03 update) 90 fps (72 fps – 1% low)
122 fps (58 fps – 1% low)
This configuration can easily handle all the modern games at QHD+ resolution and Ultra settings, with or without RT. While still a step down from the RTX 4090 model, the gaming performance of this RTX 4080 Scar 16 is still a notable improvement over the fastest gaming laptops of the past generations, with the Core i9 HX processors and the RTX 3080Ti 175W dGPU.
DLSS performance is also impressive. Nvidia made a big fuss about DLSS3 on the RTX 4000 chips, and for a good reason. Only a handful of games support DLSS 3 for now, though (Witcher and Cyberpunk are among them). We’ll discuss more about DLSS3 specifics, performance and input lag in a separate article, once we get to test a few more RTX 4000 laptops.
With that out of the way, let’s go over some performance and temperature logs.
The Turbo mode ramps up the fans to levels of ~50 dB with the laptop sitting on the desk. This is fine for a top-performance profile, but still very loud and you’ll ideally want to cover it up with headphones.
Both the CPU and the GPU run very hotly at 87-92 degrees Celsius on the CPU and 86-87 Celsius on the GPU. The GPU hits the thermal limits and throttles down in clock speeds by up to 5% between the tested titles.
You can bump up the back of the laptop off the desk, and this improves the airflow underneath the chassis and into the fans, translating in a notable decrease in CPU and GPU temperatures.
In this case, in our tests, the CPU ends up running at around 85 degrees Celsius, but the GPU averages between 75 to 85 degrees Celsius, based on the amount of allocated power. It runs at about 85C when close to 170-175W in Witcher/Cyberpunk, but it no longer throttles in longer gaming sessions.
There’s also the option to undervolt the CPU, but the minor -30 mV undervolt doesn’t change the performance or thermals outside the margin of error.
You could also opt for the Manual profile which allows customizing the power setting and fan profiles. For testing, I’ve pushed all the fans to 100% rpms, bumped the laptop on a raiser stand, and kept the power settings as they come by default. Nothing changes significantly in terms of performance, while temperatures are only minorly impacted by 1-3 degrees in this mode. Still, this might make sense on this device, especially when having the back of the laptop raised off the desk.
Next, if you’re willing to sacrifice the framerates to some extent and get a quieter gaming experience, the Performance and Silent profiles are worth pursuing.
On our unit, the Performance profile drops the fans’ noise to ~42 dBA at head level, and limits the CPU/GPU power to some extent. This translates into a 3-10% reduction in framerates, which I find perfectly acceptable.
However, with the laptop flat on the desk, the CPU/GPU temperatures are still very high on this Performance profile, in the 90s on the CPU and at 85-86 C on the GPU.
Bumping up the back of the laptop makes a difference for this profile as well, allowing the CPU/GPU temperatures to drop by 3-7 degrees.
The Silent profile limits the CPU and GPU aggressively, and results in alright temperatures and quiet fan noise (sub 35 dBA), but also a notable decrease in framerates.
Still, this profile makes perfect sense for a quiet gaming experience on FHD+ resolution and high/ultra settings.
Finally, I’ll mention the gaming performance on battery power, on the Performance profile.
This sample limited the GPU to around 40W of power on this profile, which translated into low framerates at QHD resolution, and 1+ hour of runtime.
Noise, Heat, Connectivity, speakers, and others Asus have completely updated the thermal design of this 2023 Scar 16 in comparison to the previous 2022 generations.
There are three fans now, a more ample set of heatpipes, and radiators on the side and across the entire back edge. They implemented a massive full-length heatsink over the entire back now, with a heatpipe on top that feeds into the main CPU/GPU heatpipes.
Furthermore, Thermal Grizzly’s Conductonaut Extreme liquid metal compound is applied on both the CPU and the GPU.
However, the entire cooling surface is a little smaller on this 16-inch model than on the 18-inch Scar, due to the more compact format. The change is especially around the GPU side, with a smaller fan ensemble and slightly shorter heatpipes on that part, as shows below.
As a result, the components run a little warmer in the Scar 16 than in the tested Scar 18, and placing the laptop on a raiser stand in order to help the airflow of fresh air underneath the chassis will make a more notable difference on this variant. I do recommend it on both sizes, though.
As far as noise levels go, expect 52 dBA on Manual with max-fans, ~50 dBA on Turbo, ~42 dBA of Performance, and 35 dBA on the Silent profile. I haven’t noticed any coil whining on this unit, but that’s no guarantee you won’t on yours. Make sure to properly listen for any potential issues within your return term.
Now, as far as the outer case temperatures go, there are some hotspots in the area above the keyboard and on the underbelly, over the main components, which go past 50 degrees Celsius on Performance and Turbo, but the arm-rest and keyboard areas, the surfaces that you’ll get in contact with rarely go above high-30s. Thus, this laptop never felt hot to the touch during my time with it. It does run a few degrees warmer than the larger Scar 18 tested a few weeks ago.
Keep in mind that I’ve measured the below FLIR recordings in a 24-25 C ambient room, with the laptop on the desk. Placing the laptop on a raised stand will positively impact these temperatures, dropping them by 2-3 degrees in the hottest spots, and the outer conditions in your place will also impact the readings.
*Gaming – Silent – playing Cyberpunk for 30 minutes, Silent profile, fans at ~35 dB *Gaming – Performance – playing Cyberpunk for 30 minutes, fans at ~42 dB
Gaming aside, this laptop is a breeze with everyday use, with multitasking, browsing, or video streaming. The 0dB Technology allows the fans to completely switch off with light use on the Silent profile, as long as the hardware stays under 60 C, which is most of the time. And that’s both on battery or when plugged in.
Just like on the Scar 18, though, I noticed some coil whining on this sample, but only when launching any demanding load, in the 5-10 seconds before the fans start spinning. I haven’t experienced electronic noises with daily use, though. I also haven’t experienced persistent coil whining on the Silent profile, once the fans start spinning.
*Daily Use – streaming Netflix in EDGE for 30 minutes, Silent profile, fans at 0 dB
For connectivity, there’s Wireless 6E and Bluetooth 5 on this unit, as well as 2.5 Gigabit Lan, an update from the previous generations. This sample performed well on wi-fi with my setup.
The audio quality here is pretty good for laptop speakers, with two main speakers firing on the bottom and extra tweeters firing through the grills under the display.
The sound is fairly rich and with some bass, as well as loud at ~76-78 dB at head level. I haven’t noticed any distortions at high levels, but the armrest vibrates at higher volumes, so you’ll want to use headphones for your games if this is something that bothers you. Those will also help cover up the fan noise on the higher power profiles.
Finally, the camera… there is an included camera positioned at the top of the screen and flanked by microphones. It’s merely a 720p HD shooter, though, so not much in image quality, especially in dimmer rooms. But at least it’s there for when you’ll need it, unlike on some previous ROG notebooks.
Battery life There’s a 90Wh battery inside all the 2023 ROG Scar models, just like in the previous generations.
The system is set to automatically switch the screen’s refresh to 60 Hz when using the laptop on battery power – a side effect is a quick screen flicker when you disconnect the laptop from the wall or plug it back on. I’ll also add that if you’re looking to maximize runtimes, it’s important to use the laptop on any option but the Ultimate dGPU mode in Armory Crate – ideally on the Silent profile and on the Standard/Eco dGPU mode.
Here’s what we got on our review unit in terms of battery life, with the laptop on the Standard GPU mode and the screen set on single/multi-zone lighting mode and a brightness of around 120 nits (~50% brightness).
19 W (~4-5 h of use) – text editing in Google Drive, Silent Mode, screen at 50%, WiFi ON;17 W (~5-6 h of use) – 1080p fullscreen video on Youtube in Edge, Silent Mode, screen at 50%, WiFi ON;19 W (~4-5 h of use) – Netflix 4K HDR – single-zone lighting, fullscreen in Edge, Silent Mode, screen at 50%, WiFi ON;17.5 W (~4-6 h of use) – Netflix 4K HDR – multi-zone lighting, fullscreen in Edge, Silent Mode, screen at 50%, WiFi ON;24 W (~4-5 h of use) – browsing in Edge, Silent Mode, screen at 50%, WiFi ON;75 W (~1+ h of use) – Gaming – Witcher 3, Performance Mode, screen at 50%, WiFi ON, no fps limit.
Not bad, but not great either. The mini LED panel takes a slight toll on efficiency over a regular IPS display, and it looks like setting the screen on multi-zone lighting has a positive impact on the runtimes while streaming video content.
In comparison, here’s what we got on the bigger Scar 18 model with similar specs, but with a regular IPS QHD+ display.
14 W (~5-6 h of use) – text editing in Google Drive, Silent Mode, screen at 60%, WiFi ON;15 W (~5-6 h of use) – 1080p fullscreen video on Youtube in Edge, Silent Mode, screen at 60%, WiFi ON;15 W (~5-6 h of use) – Netflix 4K HDR fullscreen in Edge, Silent Mode, screen at 60%, WiFi ON;22 W (~4-5 h of use) – browsing in Edge, Silent Mode, screen at 60%, WiFi ON;75 W (~1+ h of use) – Gaming – Witcher 3, Performance Mode, screen at 60%, WiFi ON, no fps limit.
And here’s what we got on last year’s Scar 15, with the Core i9 H + RTX 4070Ti specs, and an IPS QHD+ display.
18 W (~5 h of use) – text editing in Google Drive, Silent Mode, screen at 60%, WiFi ON;17 W (~5 h of use) – 1080p fullscreen video on Youtube in Edge, Silent Mode, screen at 60%, WiFi ON;15 W (~5-6 h of use) – Netflix fullscreen in Edge, Silent Mode, screen at 60%, WiFi ON;24 W (~3-4 h of use) – browsing in Edge, Performance Mode, screen at 60%, WiFi ON;75 W (~1+ h of use) – Gaming – Witcher 3, Performance Mode, screen at 60%, WiFi ON, no fps limit.
All these offer more or less the same runtimes on battery power with daily use, streaming, and heavier multitasking, but with a slight advantage in efficiency for the configurations with the regular IPS displays. An IPS screen is also available on some Scar 16 configurations with this generation, but now in all regions. You will find it on all the ROG Strix G16 models .
I’ll also add that this ROG Scar 16 G834 configuration comes with a 330W power brick, slightly larger and heavier than the 280W charger on the 2022 Scars. The battery fully charges from 10% in about 2 hours, with fast charging for the first half an hour.
USB-C charging is supported, up to 100W, and a ROG 100W secondary USB-C charger is included with this model over here. You won’t be able to use the laptop on Turbo/Manual while hooked over USB-C, but PD power is enough for everyday multitasking and occasional heavy workloads on Performance, in case you don’t want to bring along the bigger and heavier main charger.
Price and availability- Asus ROG Scar 16 The Asus ROG Scar 16 is listed in some regions at the time of this article.
This mid-tier ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZ reviewed here, with the i9-13980HX CPU, RTX 4080 dGPU, 32 GB of RAM, 1 TB of SSD storage, and the mini LED display, starts from $3299 $2899 in the meantime in US shops, and 3499 EUR here in Europe.
Configurations with 16 GB of RAM /1 TB storage and an IPS screen are also available in some regions, mostly here in Europe, and come at a slight discount over the above variant.
The top-tier ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZ with the same specs as the JZ, but the RTX 4090 16GB dGPU, goes for $3999 in the US and 4499 EUR in Europe. That’s a big leap in price, but there’s also a notable difference in performance between the 4080 and the 4090.
Follow this link for updated configurations and prices in your region at the time you’re reading this article.
Final thoughts- Asus ROG Strix SCAR 16 review This generation of the ROG Scar is undoubtedly much more powerful than the previous Scar 15, and better cooled as well, thanks to the updated thermal module.
I also appreciate the sturdy build quality, the updated IO and inputs, and the beautiful 16-inch mini LED display available on this series, arguably the best-balanced screen option you can find on a 16-inch gaming/performance laptop today.
At the same time, I have to make you aware once more about some of the design decisions put into this device. The smudgy plastics used for the main deck and those awkwardly placed status LEDs might seem like small details, but they’re hard to accept in this higher-tier class. I would have also appreciated if the F1-F12 writing on the keys was backlit, if there were a card reader on this laptop, or if the hinges would have allowed the display to lean further back, for the times you might want to use this on your lap or on the couch.
All these add up… and there are many good rivals out there reaching for your money. The Acer Predator Helios 16 , the Alienware m16 , the Razer Blade 16 , the MSI GE68 Raider , or the Lenovo Legion Pro 7 are just some of those options worth at least a look, each with their own strong points and quirks.
Overall, though, the ROG Strix Scar 16 is a competitive package in this i9+ RTX 4080 variant that stands out from the crowd thanks to its performance, its excellent cooling module, its price, and the implemented mini LED display, aspects most competitors cannot match entirely.
Update: I’ve updated the preliminary rating of this laptop to 4.25, as a result of the very high CPU/GPU internal temperatures measured in our gaming and high-load tests. You should consider these in your decision, especially if you’re living in a warmer place. In comparison, other laptops such as the Alienware m16 or the larger ROG Scar 18 run cooler in sustained loads and gaming sessions.
This pretty much wraps up my review of the Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 performance and gaming laptop. Look for updates over the next weeks as I get to retest this with more mature software and fill in the blanks that are yet to be finalized, and let me know what you think about this series in the comments section down below.
Disclaimer: Our content is reader-supported. If you buy through some of the links on our site, we may earn a commission.
Terms .
Navigation: Ultrabookreview.com » Asus
Review by: Andrei Girbea
Andrei Girbea is a Writer and Editor-in-Chief here at Ultrabookreview.com . I write about mobile technology, laptops and computers in general. I've been doing it for more than 15 years now. I'm a techie with a Bachelor's in Computer Engineering. I mostly write reviews and thorough guides here on the site, with some occasional columns and first-impression articles.
cridgit001
March 8, 2023 at 10:57 pm
How does this compare to the Blade 16? I've seen others be able to undervolt and overlock both the blade's cpu and gpu to trade blows with Scar 16s.
Andrei Girbea
March 9, 2023 at 11:03 am
you'll find both reviews on the site, but I reviewed the Scar and Derek reviewed the Blade, so I can't give you first hand impressions of both. The two should be fairly close, with a slight advantage in performance for the Scar, due to its better cooling and what looks like higher PCU power settings.
bert
March 9, 2023 at 4:31 am
Hi. thanks for the review. there might be some issues here. i think the laptop 4080 doesn't have 16gb vram. i think it should be just 12gb.
Also, and that is for me the most confusing part, there seem to be 2 different models out there. the g634jz and the g634jz-xs96. I was wondering if you heard anything about the different version as the xs96 just comes with 16gb ram and 1tb harddisk but literally selling everywhere for about the same price. in fact i can just find the xs96 version in every store.
asus did the same thing with the 2021 model by limiting the vram for the gpu and sometimes it was very hard to figure out which version is being sold.
Andrei Girbea
March 9, 2023 at 11:10 am
Yeah, the 4o80 is 12 Gb, updated the specs.
I can't comment on the exact available models. As far as I understnad, each local reps configure their lineup based on their preferences, so perhaps the 16 Gb 1 TB is the most widespread model at this point. Perhaps others will be available later on? I'd get in touch with your local reps and ask about it, if possible.
Steve
March 9, 2023 at 10:08 pm
Good review.
In some regions such as the UK,there is in fact a 1600P 500 nits 240 Hz LCD screen option!
Example:
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/asus-rog-strix-16-nvidia-rtx-4080-32gb-16.0-wqxga-240hz-intel-i9-13980hx-gaming-laptop-lt-2kn-as.html
£100 less than the miniLED screen version with the same specs.
Otherwise, great review!
Andrei Girbea
March 10, 2023 at 10:21 am
Thanks. Updating the article with this info!
Murad
March 10, 2023 at 12:53 am
Hi, how is the mini LED panel? İs there visible blooming effects? İs there pixel grids on the blue background?
Lynton
March 10, 2023 at 12:17 pm
Yeah too many sacrifices just to keep hot mess inefficient Intel chips cool. I'm disappointed there are so few AMD 5nm choices so far; dragon range looks like a beast and Zen4 Phoenix is incredible power for its efficiency and rdna3 onboard
Umar
March 11, 2023 at 8:48 am
Hi, did you notice any coil whine on this laptop?
Andrei Girbea
March 11, 2023 at 10:38 pm
not this one
Alberto
March 12, 2023 at 12:43 am
I have the Strix Scar 16 with RTX 4090 and I can hear coil whine when start using the GPU, it is clearly noticeable at a distance just before the fans kick in. It is a pitty considering how much this costs. I am considering returning it.
Andrei Girbea
March 12, 2023 at 5:14 pm
well, this thing is random. It happened just the same on my 4090 Scar 18 , but not on this 4080 Scar 16
alex
March 13, 2023 at 3:19 pm
Magnificent. This the first review that i Saw on the internet that very completely cover everything. thanks in advance andre.
Would u mind to review the reguler strix G16 aslo in the future? Looking forward to see that.
Andrei Girbea
March 13, 2023 at 4:04 pm
The Strix G16 review should be up most likely this week. Strix G18 as well
Andrey
August 4, 2023 at 9:03 am
Great review! Can you help me pls? I'm trying to choose an laptop, for now I'm looking between this Asus, Razer Blade 17 3070ti or Razer Blade 18 4070. Everywhere a lot of information but I'm trying to find something that can be powerfull, with good display and with avarage built quality.
Andrei Girbea
August 8, 2023 at 11:30 am
they're all good laptops, with they own share of pros and cons. Up to you to decide between them, based on your needs and budget (since the Blades are more expensive)
Joshua
August 4, 2023 at 5:54 pm
This great review is what ultimately pushed me to pull the trigger on this one, so thank you, Andrei. I'm really liking it so far with just one exception: the light bleed as you observed in the single-zone mode. Given that you evaluate laptops professionally, would you accept the amount you had on your review unit on one of your own personal machines? My screen shows about the same amount of bleed in the roughly the same spots and it does bother me (flares up my OCD, lol), but I don't know if trying to get a replacement is worth the bother as this seems common and just about impossible to fully avoid on this panel type.
Andrei Girbea
August 8, 2023 at 11:32 am
it's kind of normal for this panel, so there's no gurantee you'll end up with better uniformity on a new model. If the return is simple and doesn't cost you, you could go through a few replacements until you can find one that's better. Not sure if it's worth it, though…
Andrew Gillham
March 17, 2024 at 2:01 am
I just bought a ROG strix 2024 16" with the 4060. I've bypassed the 4060 and am using on board video from the i9 and it will only run netflix for about 2.5 hours on full charge with the monitor at 50% and in silent mode. Any ideas? Shouldn't it run longer than this?
Andrei Girbea
March 17, 2024 at 2:12 pm
it should run for way longer. I'd use the ECO mode in Armoury Crate and select the Best Power Efficiency mode from the windows power settings. Also, make sure there's no rogue software running in the background.
And when you said you bypassed the dGPU, what do you mean exactly?