Ultrabooks are great an all, with their slim bodies, long battery life and snappy performances. However, when building such anorexic laptops, some features have to be left on the side, as there’s just not enough room for them.
That’s right, there are things that ultrabooks lack today and, even though some are not deal-breakers, there are at least a couple of them that potential buyers might miss.
Those being said, in this post we’re going to talk about solutions to two of the things most ultrabooks lack: dedicated graphics and optical units. And while the later are pretty much out of the picture, but I doubt many are going to regret them, ultrabooks with dedicated discrete graphics chips are a necessity, as I’m sure many of you would like a fast laptop able to handle games or video editing software, while being as compact as light as possible.
Ultrabooks with discrete graphics – still few to choose between
Many of today’s ultrabooks feature Intel HD integrated graphics, whether the older HD 3000 or the newer HD 4000 bundled with the Ivy BRidge processors. While these chips aren’t exactly slow, as they can cope with daily tasks and all sorts of video playing (including all types of Full HD 1080p content), they can only do that much and will stumble when dealing with modern games or other graphic intense activities (editing videos, rendering 3D content, etc).
And yes, the Intel HD4000 can handle some of the recent titles in 13 x 7 resolution with details towards low. I the clip below, as an example, I’m playing some games on the Asus Zenbook Prime UX31A. But that’s about it.
If you want an improved gaming experience on an ultrabook, you will have to go for dedicated graphics. And while a pretty rare commodity, both Nvidia and AMD chips can be found on some particular ultrabooks these days, as you’ll find out from the rows below.
When talking about 13.3 inch ultrabooks, the only one to feature dedicated graphics right now is the Asus UX32VD, that bundles an Nvidia 620M chip. That’s not very powerful, but it’s still about 2-3 times faster than the integrated Intel HD 4000 chip and will allow you to run modern games like Battlefield 3, Skyrim or even Crysis at about 25-30 fps on 13×7 resolutions, with details set to medium.

The Asus UX32VD is the 13.3 inch ultrabook to get for playing games
Stepping up a notch, to 14 inch ultrabooks, you’ll find that most ultrabooks in this class do feature dedicated graphics, with either Nvidia GeForce 630M and 640M or AMD Radeon 7670M chips. So you could look at laptops like the Acer Aspire M3 and M5, the Dell XPS 14, the HP Envy 4, the Gigabyte U2442, the Samsung Series 5 Ultra and others.
The same can be said about 15.6 inch ultrabooks, and although there aren’t that many to choose from right now, the HP Envy 6t, the Dell XPS 15 or the Asus Zenbook UX51VZ are good options popping to my mind (although the latest are not exactly ultrabooks per se, according to Intel’s definition).
Now, out of these platforms, you should look for something powered by an Nvidia 640M chip (or higher), as these are built on the newer Kepler architecture, that focuses on performances and efficiency (the chips need less energy and run cooler). However, on most devices you’ll find either the Nvidia 630M , the 640M LE or the AMD 7670M chips, which are decent mainstream dedicated graphics, but can be easily put to their knees by the recent titles.

If possible, go for something with an Nvidia 640M inside
Of course, I’m expecting more ultrabooks with discrete graphics in the near future, so I will periodically update this post.
Update: This post will tell you more about the top gaming ultrabooks you could buy these days, which feature discrete graphics, of course.
Bottom point, if looking at one of these machines, you should have realistic expectations: don’t get your hopes too high, they can run games, but not really the latest titles and not on high resolutions or detail levels. If you need those, go for proper gaming laptops, not for gaming ultrabooks.
Optical drives on ultrabooks – are you sure you need them?
When you decide to design an 0.6-0.8 inch thick portable computer, it’s obvious that you will have to make a couple of compromises and cut a few corners. With the slim bodies, there’s simply not enough room on modern ultrabooks for optical drives, whether CD, DVD or Blu-ray units. Especially on 13.3 inch or smaller devices.
If you’re considering some bigger 14 inch or even 15.6 inch ultrabooks, there are some however that feature optical drives, like the 14 inch Samsung Series 5 Ultra NP530, the Acer Aspire M3 and M5, the 15 inch Dell XPS 15, Asus S56 and Vivobook S550 and a couple of others. However, when compared to other ultrabooks in their classes, these are a bit bulkier or pack smaller batteries, mainly because the precious space inside the case is now occupied by the optical drive.
This post will show you all the ultrabooks with optical drives available right now in stores, so you should definitely check it out.
To be frank, I haven’t used a CD or DVD in years, so the lack of optical drives on ultrabooks is not really an issue for me. But, if you really want to buy such a computer and need to use DVD/CD or Blu-ray discs with it, there’s a solution: get an external optical unit that can be easily connected to your laptop via USB. I’ve got a selection of good such optical drives over at TLBHD.com, so you should check it out.
Bottom point, I wouldn’t worry too much about optical drives on my ultrabook, you’ll hardly need it anyway, so you’d better get something that uses the space for something else. And if you do need to read those discs, a good and simple external drive costs less than $50 and will work with any computers, as long as they have an USB port.

Be honest, when’s the last time you used one of those? Oh, you don’t remember? I wonder why…
Wrap up
In the end, you have to understand that ultrabooks are meant to be sleek and portable, thus will lack some of the features you get on bigger laptops, like discrete graphics or optical units, as there’s not enough space inside them for those.
However, several manufacturers do offer ultrabooks that will feature these as well and as technology improves, we’ll probably see more options (and here I’m mainly talking about options with discrete graphics, not optical units, which are more or less obsolete these days).
You’ll usually find dedicated graphics on many 14 inch or bigger laptops in this class, while this feature is probably going to be quite rare on 13.3 inchers or smaller machines in the near future as well.
Once again, if you’re after my list of recommended ultrabooks for gaming, you’ll find it via this link.
With optical units, you only get them on a hand-full of ultrabooks right now, all of them 14 or 15.6 inchers. And you’ll also notice that the DVD drives are only present on budget ultrabooks, that tend to be more massive than the premium members of their families.
Still, ultrabooks are not really meant for games, and if you’re looking to run some simple titles, the integrated Intel HD 4000 chip on the Ivy Bridge architecture is powerful enough to handle them (and the future Haswell graphics will be even better). As for the optical units, you can buy external drives for cheap and solve the issue for good.
Furthermore, I’m pretty sure more ultrabooks featuring discrete graphics or integrated optical drives will be launched in the future. However, don’t expect those to be featured on all ultrabooks on the market, that’s not going to happen.






re. optical drive, I still use mine all the time. Streaming for watching movies is still slow or unreliable with many wi fi sources. It’s still so nice and convenient to slip a favorite cd or dvd into the laptop without having to connect an external drive. And, if one is a serious photographer, still better imo to burn a disc if you have a bunch of hi res photos. And, just try to send then over the net. Takes forever, or sometimes never because the connection breaks down.
I could agree on the movies part, although streaming is fast over here on pretty much all the existing services.
I can’t on the other, it’s a lot easier to use a Flash drive or even some external Hard-drives. They are fast and quite affordable these days. Flash drives are like 1-2 bucks per GB these days
Thanks for the response. Well, I am a professional photographer in my current life (aerospace engineer before that), and I like to back up my “memories” with archival dvd’s which cost about 2 bucks apiece–cheap considering the cost of the trip or the shoot. Easy to organize, label, and, as far as I can tell from a bit of research, flash drives are still not archival.
And, you don’t have to be a pro. Ever look back on those family prints from the old days? We love them. Doesn’t matter if they were kept in a dark place, They still are fade. Sure, you can archival prints and albums made. But, what about the original media for those irreplaceable moments–1st bday party, first steps.
external drives, I have too many gadgets without cords, cords without gadgets as it is.
Finally, I don’t see a hard spec re. thiickness and weight for ultrabooks. I’ll bet the clever designers can add an optical drive without adding more than 3/8 of an inch and less than 0.5 pounds. Still pretty ultra in my book.
I guess we will have to respectfully disagree.
Though commenting a bit late due to finding the article late: Please note, that DVDs are NOT a good long-time storage, when we’re talking about decades. I already have DVDs, that are degraded to the point of not being readable by normal drives anymore. I remember vaguely having read, that even reasonably good storage conditions, a DVD might not be usable after 10 years. The DVD is a reasonable backup solution though, e.g. in addition to an external hard drive.
@ matte screens: While I have yet to find a matte screen protection foil on par with a natively matte screen, I have found the foil from the Germany-based company “Folix” surprisingly good; It enables me to use my smartphone even in bright summer sun and was easy to apply (though one should heed the practical tips delivered with the foil). I found a 15″ from them one for about 20€ with reasonably low shipping costs to Austria (note that they also cell on the UK Amazon). For comparison: My foil was 6€ and 1.50€ shipping — for low-price products shipping from Amazon.de to Austria commonly is more expensive than the product.
I personally would love to see an “ultrabook” with dedicated graphics, however you may like to know that ultrabook is a marketing term coined by Intel, (they claim a trademark on the name). One of the requirements to use the ultrabook brand is an integrated graphics card….
how can i watch a dvd with ultrabook.can any additional accessory help out this with ultrabook
you can use an external DVD player that connects to the ultrabook via the USB port
Sorry, but having to keep track of an extra piece of equipment and a cord defeats in my mind the whole point of an ultrabook. Give us the choice and make us pay for it. Really dumb of Apple and the pc vendors following like lemmings.
Well, it’s not like vendors don’t give us a choice. There are now some devices falling into that cross-over cathegory (Sony Vaio S13, Lenovo Thinkad S430, Samsung Series 7). Obviously though such devices will be slightly heavier than ultrabooks and not necessarily cheaper. The Sony can even be ordered with SSD (but not hybrid solution) and actually has a replaceable HDD and battery and a nice extension-battery concept.
It will remain to be seen from the response of the market, whether the “ultraportable with optical drive” or the “ultraportable at all costs” is preferred by customers, so I guess those of us who don’t entirely like the ultrabook concept just have to wait an see.
By the way, I just wish the companies were copying Apple’s screen quality… Amongst current 13″ and 14″ devices, screens with HD+ (1600×900) or more might get more and more common, but brightness is often just barely acceptable (slightly above 200 cd/m²) for a portable device and contrasts a bad joke (180:1 in Vaio S13 and 130:1 in Samsung Series 7 Chronos 700Z3C).
Yu, I’m sure we’ll see way better screens on laptops in general in the next years. I for one, getting used to the IPS panel on my Lenovo X220, will never buy a laptop without an IPS screen. Luckily, the premium Windows laptops will feature it. Take a look at the Asus UX31A for instance, I’ve played with it and that screen is gorgeous.
So for me, the issue is not necessarily the brightness of the screen, I tend to use my laptop inside most of the time. Viewing angles, colors and contrast however are something I’m very sensitive about and like I said, you just can’t beat IPS panels for that. If you’re not planning to run games of course, as IPS screens tend to be a bit ghostly these days.
There is however one more aspect: in order to keep the prices lower, manufacturers usually compromise on the screen’s quality. So, if IPS panels are to become popular, I’d expect them to be featured only by premium laptops, somewhere in the same price-range as Macbooks. But then, is there a proper market for solid $1500+ laptops?