Acer Swift 3 SF314-52 review – budget 14-inch laptop with Nvidia MX150 graphics

Back to top
Specs Sheet
Design and exterior
Keyboard and trackpad
Screen
Hardware and performance
Noise, heat and speakers
Battery life
Price and availability
Final thoughts
Comments

By Andrei GirbeaAcer Swift 3 SF314-52, last updated on September 12, 2018

Acer Swift 3 SF314-52

Summary: The updated Swift 3 SF314-52 is a good 14-inch laptop with a fairly thin and light body, solid construction, an excellent backlit keyboard, punchy speakers and smooth everyday performance. It is a little chubbier than other 14-incher with similar traits, but also more affordable, which is a trade-off many will probably accept. Just be aware it comes with a dim, washed out and glossy non-touch screen with an IPS panel, but a pretty crappy one. The big selling point is the hardware inside though, as this laptop is available with modern Core U processors and optional Nvidia MX150 graphics. Read on for the whole story.

Our score: 4 / 5
Price when reviewed: $649 and up

THE GOOD

nice build quality and finishing
great keyboard and trackpad
proper IO
multiple configurations available, some with quad-core CPUs and dedicated graphics
solid everyday use experience
more affordable than the competition

THE BAD

some sharp edges here and there
a little bigger and heavier than other options
glossy non-touch screen with a dim and washed out panel (IPS though)
fan active all the time

Table of Contents

Specs as reviewed
Design and first look
Screen
Keyboard and trackpad
Hardware and performance
Noise, Heat, Connectivity, speakers and others
Battery life
Price and availability
Final thoughts

The Aspire Swift 3 SF314-51 is one of the best value laptops I’ve reviewed in the last 12 months, selling for under $600 with a proper Core U configuration, SSD storage and an IPS screen.

As of mid 2017 Acer updated that notebook and we’ve spent some time with this new version and gathered all our impressions below, with the goods and the quirks.

The new model is called Swift 3 SF314-52, with that 2 at the end of the name telling the two generations apart. It is however different in many ways: it gets a different build and design, a glossy non-touch screen this time, a backlit keyboard with a new layout, updated hardware inside and optional Nvidia MX150 dedicated graphics. The pricing policy hasn’t changed much though and still remains one of this computer’s strongest selling points.

The article below will tell you whether this new Acer Swift 3 is a good buy or not, and how it fares against the competition.

Specs as reviewed

	Acer Swift 3 SF314-52
Screen	14.0 inch, 1920 x 1080 px, IPS, non-touch, glossy
Processor	Intel Skylake Core i7-7500U CPU
Video	Intel HD 620 + Nvidia MX150 2GB DDR5 (optional)
Memory	8 GB LPDDR3 (soldered)
Storage	128 M.2 SATA SSD (80 mm) + 512 GB SSD (2.5″ bay)
Connectivity	Wireless AC (Intel AC 7265), Bluetooth 4.1
Ports	2x USB 3.0 and 1 x USB 2.0 Type-A slots, 1x USB 3.1 Type-C gen 1, HDMI, card-reader, mic/headphone, Kensington lock
Battery	48 Wh, 65W charger
OS	Windows 10
Size	338 mm or 13.30” (w) x 234 mm or 9.23” (d) x 18 mm or 0.70” (h)
Weight	3.77 lbs (1.71 kg)+ .70 lbs (.32 kg) charger and cables
Extras	backlit keyboard, HD webcam, fingerprint reader, available in Silver, Blue or Pink

This series is available in a few different configurations, with Core i5 and i7 U processors, various amounts of storage and with or without the Nvidia MX150 dedicated graphics.

There are also versions with the KabyLake-R (Coffee Lake) Core i5-8250U quad-core processor and Nvidia MX150 graphics available in stores as of Q3 2017, as well as several 15-inch variants (the SF315-51 and the updated SF315-52 model).

As of 2018 Acer offers several more compact and lighter updates of this laptop, the SF314-54 models with KabyLake hardware, or the more premium SF314-55 and 56, with compact builds, Whiskey Lake hardware, MX150 MQ graphics and improved screens. You’ll find all about these newer Swift 3s from our detailed review.

Design and first look

The updated Swift 3 has gained some weight from the previous generation, at least on the configuration we reviewed that comes with dedicated graphics and dual-storage. It weighs nearly 3.8 lbs and is about 18 mm thick, which makes it pretty much averagely sized: portable enough to grab along in your bag or backpack, but a little heavier than the new generation 14-inchers like the Lenovo IdeaPad 320S or Asus Zenbook UX410, for example. It’s also a few mms bigger, as the bezels around the screen are fairly chunky, but it’s worth noting that all the 14-inchers with more compact builds are also more expensive, and I’m pretty sure many of you won’t mind this compromise: spend less and get a marginally bigger and heavier laptop.

The new Swift 3 gets a slight design change as well. The old version looked a lot like a Macbook Air, this one looks like a standard Acer laptop, with lines and branding elements that Acer puts on all their computers, like the Switch engraving on the piece of plastic between the screen’s hinges. Our test sample came in a subtle Silver color scheme, but Acer also offer this series in Pink and Blue if you’d rather get a more colorful computer.

There are no lights on the interior and no annoying design elements, but you should peel off the ugly sticker on the palm-rest and the one on the screen to preserve the otherwise clean looks.

There’s little to nag about the overall build quality and finishing. This Swift 3 gets a strong metallic lid, a metallic interior with a brushed finishing, and a plastic bottom made from soft, rubbery plastic. All of them should age well and do a good job at hiding smudges and fingerprints. There’s a little flex in the hood and in the keyboard’s deck, but nothing out of ordinary for this mid-range class.

The tapered metallic edges around the interior are kind of sharp though and although the laptop has a fairly low profile and roomy palm-rest, my wrists actually came in contact with them quite often when typing and didn’t like it at all. I also noticed an oddity: the screen is actually a little shorter than the main body and as a result it’s quite difficult to grab and lift-up, especially since there’s no crease to make the process simpler. The metallic edge around the screen is fairly sharp as well, so I’d reckon fingertips and nails will suffer when using this laptop everyday.

Once you do manage to grab the screen, the hinges do a good job at smoothly adjusting it and firmly keeping it in place. They also allow it to go back flat to 180 degrees.

You might have noticed by now that the display is glossy, but this is not a touchscreen, it just gets a layer of Gorilla Glass on top of a non-touch panel. Acer claims this makes the entire ensemble tougher and keeps the panel safe, but in reality a glossy screen also adds reflections and glare that are highly in brighter environments. And it’s even more problematic when the panel beneath is dim, like in this case, but more about that in a further section.

Flipping the laptop upside down you’ll notice big rubber feet that keep the computer well anchored anchored on a flat surface, as well as the speakers in the corners and a large intake grill. The hot air is pushed out through a grill behind the hinge and we’ll more talk about the cooling solution and its performance in the appropriate section below.

The IO is the last aspect we’ll mention here though. This laptop gets pretty much what’s expected in this category, with 3x Type A USB ports, 1x USB Type C port (without Thunderbolt 3), HDMI, a card-reader, a mic jack and a Kensington Lock. Most of them are placed on the left edge, which leaves an uncluttered right side in case you plan to use a mouse.

Screen

There’s a 14-inch display on this laptop with fairly chunky bezels and a layer of Gorilla Glass on top. There’s no touch though, Acer just decided to go with the glossy cover for extra strength and protection, but I consider it a poor decision in terms of usability and a downgrade from the simple, matte screen of the older Swift 3.

I’ve heard the argument that glossy screens show more vibrant colors, but that’s mostly untrue. The panel’s quality matters a lot more, and this notebook falls short here. It gets an IPS panel, so the viewing angles and contrast are fairly good, but it’s otherwise dim and limited in terms of color coverage, as you can see below:

Panel HardwareID: AU Optronics AUO213D (B140HAN02.1);
Coverage: 65% sRGB, 47% NTSC, 49% AdobeRGB;
Measured gamma: 2.1;
Max brightness in the middle of the screen: 197 cd/m2 on power;
Contrast at max brightness: 850:1;
White point: 7100 K;
Black on max brightness: 0.23 cd/m2;
Average DeltaE: 3.2 uncalibrated, 1.81 calibrated.

This is in fact the same panel used on some versions of the older Swift 3 and the glass takes an extra small toll on the maximum brightness, which was poor to begin with. Adding the glare on top, this screen is pretty much unusable outdoors or in bright light, but it’s fine for indoors as long as you don’t expect rich, accurate colors. Our calibrated color profile improves the gray levels and balances colors to some extent, but there’s still so much you can expect get with this kind of gamut coverage.

I’ve also noticed a fair amount of light bleeding around the edges, so the glass doesn’t seem to help with that either, even if the screen feels otherwise fairly well built.

It’s also worth adding that this screen leans back flat to 180 degrees, so at least they kept that from the older Swift 3. It’s very useful for those of us that use the laptop on the lap, or leaned on our thighs when lying on the bed or on the sofa.

Keyboard and trackpad

I’m happy with this keyboard and I’d expect most of you to like it too, as long as you’re used to short-stroke keys, the kind you get on most ultraportables these days.

The keys are well spaced and have a nice, rubbery finishing. They’re also quiet to type on and responsive, with a proper click and good feedback. Some might find them a little shallow, but I actually found them quite good and was able to type fast and accurately.

This keyboard is also backlit, but the illumination is only activated by pressing a key and not by swiping the fingers over the trackpad.

The layout is pretty standard, but those tiny arrow keys cramped by tiny Home/End dedicated keys will need time to get used to. Overall I still prefer this layout over the older one from the Swift 3 SF314-51 that gets that extra line of Function keys on the right, as I’m already accustomed to tiny arrows from my XPS 13. I could probably live with either of them just fine after a while though.

The trackpad is large and carved into the palm-rest, with tapered edges around. It’s a plastic Synaptics surface, so the finger doesn’t glide on it as easily as on a glass surface, but otherwise provides a smooth and consistent experience with swipes, taps and gestures. The click buttons are a little mushy, but quiet.

There’s also a fingerprint reader integrated in the right-corner of the arm-rest, beneath the arrows keys. It’s properly sized and works well with Windows Hello.

Hardware and performance

Acer offers the Swift 3 in multiple configurations and we got to test one of the the higher end models, with a Core i7-7500U processor, 8 GB of DDR4 RAM, two SSDs and an Nvidia MX150 dedicated graphics chip with 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, which is perhaps this laptop’s most interesting feature.

It’s also worth noting that as of the Fall of 2017 Acer plans to equip the Swift 3 with the newer Intel Coffee Lake Core i5-8250U processor as well, a quad-core ULV CPU, but more about that in a future article, but I can’t tell for sure whether that will make it into this 14-inch model or is reserved for the larger 15-inch Swift 3 SF315.

Of course the Swift 3 comes without dedicated graphics as well, and you should opt for one of those models if you want a computer for daily tasks and don’t plan to play any games. You wouldn’t even need the Core i7 processor for everyday use, a Core i5 configuration with 8 GB of RAM and a 256 GB SSD will do just fine for browsing, video content, editing texts, etc. The CPU and GPU perform just as expected with daily activities, as you can see below.

The RAM, GPU and CPU are soldered on the motherboard, but the storage, wireless chip and battery are accessible once you remove the back panel. We didn’t get to do it on this sample, but it’s hold in place by visible Torx screws and should pop open fairly easily with the help of some plastic priers.

But back to the GPU. The MX150 is an entry-level dedicated graphics chip, part of Nvidia’s Pascal line, the mobile version of the desktop GeForce GT 1030. It’s meant to provide FHD gaming capabilities with medium/high settings while running efficiently, so it will make its way on a handful of thin-and-light laptops, as well as on budget ultraportables like this Swift 3. You can find more about the Nvidia MX150 from this dedicated article.

Although our sample is a pre-release version and drivers should improve by the time it reaches retail stores, it did well in our tests, with only minor issues in some benchmarks where the CPU would occasionally drop bellow its maximum TurboBoost speeds (you’ll find details in the pictures below).

As a result, here’s what we got on this test unit:

3DMark 11: P4201;
3DMark 13: Sky Driver – 9092, Fire Strike – 3031, Time Spy – 1106;
PCMark 08: Home Conventional – 2942;
PCMark 10: 3416;
Geekbench 3 32-bit: Single-Core: 3341, Multi-core: 7292;
Geekbench 4 64-bit: Single-Core: 3920, Multi-core: 7873;
CineBench 11.5: OpenGL 52.02 fps, CPU 3.77 pts, CPU Single Core 1.25 pts;
CineBench R15: OpenGL 85.70 fps, CPU 331 cb, CPU Single Core 138 cb;
x264 HD Benchmark 4.0 32-bit: Pass 1 – 118.52 fps, Pass 2 – 21.76 fps.

I am however a bit concerned on how the Core i5-8250U CPU will perform on this laptop, given how our test unit barely kept the dual-core i7-7500U at full speeds in demanding loads. But it’s way too early to comment on this aspect as of right now when that i5 is still months from being released.

Next we’re going to compare the MX150’s performance to the older 940MX chips that were previously used in mid-range thin-and-lights, both in benchmarks results and in actual games. First, the benchmarks:

	MX150 2 GB DDR5	940MX 2 GB DDR3	940MX 2 GB DDR5	Intel HD 620
3DMark 11	P4201	~P2350	~P2800	~P1750
3DMark – Time Spy Graphics	1037	~630	~700	~320
3DMark – Fire Strike Graphics	3500	~1650	~2150	~900
3DMark – Sky Diver Graphics	10983	~6100	~7100	~3600

And second, in some of the games we’ve tried on this sample, at FHD resolution and Low details:

	MX150 2 GB DDR5	940MX 2 GB DDR3	940MX 2 GB DDR5	Intel HD 620
Grid: Autosport	96 fps	~53 fps	~67 fps	~35 fps
Bioshock Infinite	78 fps	~36 fps	~46 fps	~ 24 fps
Far Cry 4	50 fps	~24 fps	~30 fps	~20 fps
NFS Most Wanted	52 fps	~31 fps	~36 fps	~30 fps
Tomb Raider	100 fps	~52 fps	~78 fps	~40 fps

And at FHD resolution and High details:

	MX150 2 GB DDR5	940MX 2 GB DDR3	940MX 2 GB DDR5	Intel HD 620
Grid: Autosport	65 fps	~28 fps	~38 fps	~22 fps
Bioshock Infinite	53 fps	~20 fps	~32 fps	~15 fps
Far Cry 4	29 fps	~16 fps	~21 fps	~15 fps
NFS Most Wanted	34 fps	~17 fps	~25 fps	~12 fps
Tomb Raider	52 fps	~20 fps	~32 fps	~15 fps

And here’s how the MX150 chip performed in the same games with Low, High and Ultra settings.

	FHD Ultra	FHD High	FHD Low
Grid: Autosport	37 fps	65 fps	96 fps
Bioshock Infinite	35 fps	53 fps	78 fps
Far Cry 4	25 fps	29 fps	50 fps
Shadow of Mordor	24 fps	32 fps	47 fps
Metro Last Light	26 fps	33 fps	52 fps
Tomb Raider	28 fps	52 fps	100 fps
Total War: Atilla	11 fps	16 fps	52 fps

It’s also worth mentioning that I noticed no performance loss when gaming on battery, with both the CPU and GPU running at full loads in this case.

All in all, the MX150 is about twice the performance in games of the regular GT 940MX with GDDR3 memory and a big step-up from the DDR5 version as well. So if you care about gaming on a thin-and-light laptop or a budget ultraportable, this is absolutely the option to get starting with the second half of 2017. More about the GeForce MX150 and the available laptops bundled with it in this dedicated article.

Noise, Heat, Connectivity, speakers and others

The cooling solution uses a fan and two heatpipes that spread on top both the CPU and GPU. I don’t have a picture to show you as of right now though, but it’s a pretty standard implementation.

The fan spins pretty much all the time, even with the most basic of activities, but at 38-39 dB is barely audible in a normal environment. You’ll hear it in a quiet room though. It is however surprisingly quiet at full blast, only averaging 41-42 dB at head-level, something the speakers can actually cover easily.

The fan is efficient with daily use, keeping the internals and the outer case cool (30-35 Celsius) and does fair job in gaming and demanding activities. The shell gets hot in some places and gaming on the lap is not very pleasant, but mid 40s on some parts of the back and the upper inner deck are normal for a laptop as thin as this one. The heat spreads towards the keyboard though and can lead to some uncomfortably sweaty hands.

*Daily Use – 1080p Youtube clip in EDGE for 30 minutes
*Load – playing Far Cry 4 for 30 minutes

Connectivity wise there’s wireless AC and Bluetooth 4.1 on the Swift 3. Acer went with an Intel AC 7265 module on our sample which is a proven option and solid performer both near the router and at longer ranges. Nothing to complain about here.

As far as the speakers go, they’re actually punchy and a step-up from the older Swift 3. They’re still placed on the bottom, but no longer distort at high volumes and no longer sound weird on a desk or when using the laptop on the lap and occasionally covering them. They’re also fairly loud at up to 80 dB at head level and the sound is surprisingly rich and clean.

As for the webcam, it’s placed on top of the screen and flanked by microphones and it’s an average option with HD resolution that should do fine for occasional Skype calls.

Battery life

Acer puts a 48 Wh battery on this Swift 3, which is not bad for a budget laptop, especially since there’s no energy-hungry screen on this thing, but still a little smaller than what some of the competition offers.

Here’s what you should expect from the i7 configuration we tested here (we set the screen’s brightness 50%, which is around 120 nits):

7.7 W (~6 h of use) – very light browsing and text editing in Google Drive, Balanced Mode, screen at 50%, Wi-Fi ON;
5.8 W (~8 of use) – 1080p fullscreen video on Youtube in Internet Explorer, Balanced Mode, screen at 50%, Wi-Fi ON;
4.8 W (~10 h of use) – 1080p fullscreen .mkv video in the Movie app, Balanced Mode, screen at 50%, Wi-Fi ON;
5.3 W (~9 of use) – 4K fullscreen .mkv video in the Movie app, Balanced Mode, screen at 50%, Wi-Fi ON;
11.5 W (~4 h of use) – everyday browsing in Edge, Balanced Mode, screen at 50%, Wi-Fi ON.
38 W (~1 h 25 min of use) – gaming at FHD low details, screen at 50%, Wi-Fi ON.

A standard 65 W charger is included in the pack, which weighs about .32 kg, and a full-recharge takes around 2 hours and 30 minutes.

Price and availability

The KabyLake-R models of the Swift 3 (name code SF314-52G) with the Core i5-8250U processor, Nvidia MX150 graphics, 8 GB of RAM and a 256 GB SSD are available in the US with an MSRP of $699 as of September 2017. Core i7 versions with more RAM and larger storage space are also available.

Follow this link for more details, updated configurations and prices in your region at the time you’re reading the article, or this one for more info on the 15-inch version of this laptop, the Swift 3 SF315.

Final thoughts

Let’s get this out first: I absolutely hate laptops with glossy non-touch displays. If you’re like me, this updated Swift 3 is not for you and you should consider the previous Swift 3 SF314-51 generation instead, which is similar in most ways, more portable and should even sell for less with discounts.

If you can live with a glossy display though and if you keep your laptop indoors all the time, the new Swift 3 SF314-52 should be on your map, especially for those of you that want a powerful and compact laptop with gaming abilities. The Nvidia MX150 chip is a big step-up from the GT 940MX options available on most other laptops with similar traits (for now), and those quad-core Coffee Lake processors are an important particularity as well, IF they’ll actually make it into this 14-inch model and if this laptop actually manages to keep temperatures at bay and get the most out of them.

That aside, the Swift 3 SF314-52 is overall a pretty good laptop with an excellent price. It’s well built, gets an excellent backlit keyboard, proper IO, an IPS screen, decent battery life, fast wireless and punchy speakers. It also runs smoothly and cool with everyday use and can handle gaming well, as already mentioned above.

On the other hand, I do have some complains. Some are subjective, like the fact that those edges around the interior are sharp or that the fan is active all the time with basic tasks and it doesn’t have to be. Others are just standard for this segment, like the fact that the screen is rather washed out and the battery inside is only average in size. And some are potential deal-breakers, which gets us back to the sub-par display with a dim panel and a glossy glass coating on top that I personally resent.

If you can live with these, the Swift 3 can be for you. If not, then you can also check out other 14-inchers with similar features like the updated Swift 3 SF314-55 series, the Lenovo IdeaPad 320s and 510s, the Dell Latitude 3480, the HP ProBook 440 or the Asus Pro P2440 / B9440 and Zenbooks UX410 and UX430 series, each with their own fair of strong points and nits. Or this longer list of 14 and 15-inch ultraportables.

All in all, I’d have the Swift 3 SF314 on my map for the Coffee Lake configuration and MX150 graphics, but you’ll have to keep on eye on the performance once available, as well as the competition at the time. And that wraps-up our review, but the comments section is open for your feedback and questions and we’re around to help if we can.

Disclaimer: Our content is reader-supported. If you buy through some of the links on our site, we may earn a commission. Terms.

Review by: Andrei Girbea
Andrei Girbea is a Writer and Editor-in-Chief here at Ultrabookreview.com. I write about mobile technology, laptops and computers in general. I've been doing it for more than 15 years now. I'm a techie with a Bachelor's in Computer Engineering. I mostly write reviews and thorough guides here on the site, with some occasional columns and first-impression articles.

37 Comments

Sushil

July 23, 2017 at 9:03 am

Man i have obeserved a 240GB kingston ssd in every review of yours.. I was thinking how do you add that additional drive even when there is not space & connection for another ssd drive.
- Andrei Girbea
  
  July 23, 2017 at 3:06 pm
  
  it's just an external SSD hooked up through USB. I use it to load up the benchmarks and usually don't disconnect it before taking the hwifno pic :)
alex

July 26, 2017 at 1:22 pm

Thanks for the review. Not surprising to see cpu throttling, hopefully intel improved heat a little bit with coffee lake, otherwise throttling could be even more aggressive in those parts.

afaik, the dell xps 13 and and some hp 13 inch will be receiving coffee lake, they are being tested right now but not sure if dell will release in early fall or towards the end.
- Andrei Girbea
  
  July 26, 2017 at 1:41 pm
  
  I'm really curious on that XPS 13 with Coffee Lake
  - Nitesh
    
    July 31, 2017 at 3:01 pm
    
    I hope Coffee Lake means 13"ers will start using 15-28 watt quads.
alex

July 26, 2017 at 11:00 pm

Here are the links for the i5-8250u

browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/search?q=I5+8250u

xps13
browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/3168934
Bappy

July 31, 2017 at 1:38 pm

If you could do a video review that would be great!
Anon

August 2, 2017 at 5:41 pm

Is this out yet? I can't find it anywhere?!
Matt

August 18, 2017 at 2:38 am

"I absolutely hate laptops with glossy non-touch displays."
That is what anti-glare screen protectors are for. Also makes the touch experience with fingers/stylus much better thanks to their smooth matte coating. I'm quite surprised very few people know of their existence and dismiss a laptop/tablet/phone just because of its glossy screen.
- Andrei Girbea
  
  August 18, 2017 at 12:58 pm
  
  But this is not a touchscreen :) I don't have a problem with glossy touchscreens, I understand the need for the glass in that case, I don't on something without touch. I've been using laptops with normal matte screens for a very long time and without an issue, I can't accept or encourage this approach that for me makes no sense.
  
  And yes, I'm aware of screen protectors. But my experience with them isn't great. Not that easy to apply perfectly, not that reliable and an added expense that I can't justify. Just my2c, of course :)
  - Matt
    
    August 19, 2017 at 1:20 am
    
    That is true indeed. Precisely one of many reasons why I prefer business and gaming laptops to consumer laptops.
  - Andrei Girbea
    
    August 19, 2017 at 4:33 am
    
    I do too, I've been using ThinkPads for a long time in the past, but business laptops are expensive and I'd reckon most users can't justify paying the extra. Luckily there are a lot more mainstream laptops with matte screens these days.
John Smith

August 20, 2017 at 11:31 am

In the specs a 512gb ssd 2.5inch bay was mentioned. Does that meam there is a 2.5inch bay inside the laptop you can install a hdd?
- Andrei Girbea
  
  August 20, 2017 at 1:56 pm
  
  Yes. I didn't get to take a pic of the insides for this laptops, but yes, there are an M.2 80 mm slot and a 2.5" bay for storage
Igor Juric

September 2, 2017 at 2:14 pm

Do you happen to know if RAM can be upgraded to 16GB?
- Andrei Girbea
  
  September 3, 2017 at 4:42 am
  
  I didn't get to openm this one, so I don't know if the memory is soldered or if it comes with a DIMM. If it's soldered it's non-upgradeable, and from what I'm seeing from HWinfo, I believe it is soldered. Make sure to check in other sources though, perhaps you can find a disassembly guide
Roy

September 5, 2017 at 8:21 pm

Do you know if the HDMI port is 2.0 or not?
Seeratlas

September 24, 2017 at 3:04 pm

for those with questions bout the i5 coffee lake/mxx150 14" version, I am typing on it now :) A few comments, 1st, when hard/long gaming you Can get it to throttle-barely, and not all the time, depends a LOT on whether you use a cooler. I have done several hour long sessions and hwinfo shows a max of 82-83 degrees on core 0. If running on the intel 620, but maxxing the cpu, it has NOT throttled. The Nvid Gpu has registered a max of 70c.
Second, the included ssd is an 256 gig intel nvme, not quick as a Samsung 900 series, but faster than the sata ssd's by a bunch. The fan DOES NOT run constantly as the author noticed on his unit. The i5 8 series seems a very efficient chip. I do NOT notice hot spots on the chassis, and sometimes game in bed with the unit on my lap. It is not at all uncomfortable. I'm surprised at the comments on the screen. I have noticed neither a lack of brightness, nor washed out colors-seems fine to me, but I don't work outside with a laptop. Similarly, i cannot recall any incidents of reflection issues. The screen seems just fine to me. This is NOT an easy laptop to open up, the fit and finish, seem exceptionally good, and Tight! Even after removing all the screws, I was unable to 'ease' my my pry tools into any seam, and I have a full set of pro tools and have building, disassembling laptops and desktops since before the compaq luggable (infer "LOOONG damned time" here..). Anyway, i took the chance, pulled the trigger with Amazon, and am both amazed and fully satisfied with what Acer has done here. In truth, a rather remarkable effort, and hats off for a job well done. Excellent review here, and your predictions are pretty much borne out..
- Andrei Girbea
  
  September 24, 2017 at 3:42 pm
  
  Thanks for the feedback. Are you sure the fans aren't always active, but just very quiet and inaudible in a normal environment?
  
  As far as the screen goes, is it the same panel as on my unit? you can tell that with HWInfo. Even if it is, my impressions can be subjective, I test a lot of laptops, some of them with very nice screens, so there's a good chance my expectations are higher than the average user's, despite the fact that I do my best to post an objective opinion in the articles.
- TCJ
  
  September 27, 2017 at 2:41 am
  
  Thanks for all the info! Does your model also have a slot to add another SSD? Or is it limited to only the storage that it ships with?
Peter Wiersma

September 29, 2017 at 8:53 am

Thanks for the review Andrei Girbea. Are you gonna do a review on the new version (SF314-52G-55WQ) with the 8250u CPU and the mx150 GPU? The specs look promising but there is not much information on it. Except for the comment from Seeratlas and a user review on Amazon. I really like to know if they improved the screen and fan noise.
- Andrei Girbea
  
  September 29, 2017 at 11:09 am
  
  Can't tell for sure, but probably not. I don't think that model is available over here yet.
Kris

October 2, 2017 at 12:26 pm

I'd be interesting in seeing some comments on the 15.6" version. While I prefer the 14" form factor, I'd also like to be able to go up to 16 GB. It seems that to get the MX150 with expandable RAM, you have to go for the 15.6" version, as the 14" uses LPDDR3.

I'm wondering how hard it's going to be to get a 13" or 14" with an MX150 that's upgradable to 16 GB at a reasonable price.
- Andrei Girbea
  
  October 3, 2017 at 3:22 am
  
  The 15 inch model is not available in my region yet. Have you actually seen a disassembly guide that shows accessible DIMMS inside, or are you just assuming the RAM isn't soldered on those one based on the fact that the specs sheet claim DDR4 memory?
Kris

October 3, 2017 at 9:57 am

I know DDR4 can be soldered as well as the Spin5s have soldered DDR. At least with one model here in the US, acer.com/ac/en/US/content/model/NX.GSJAA.001 it's showing that it comes with 8 GB standard and up to 16 GB maximum. Now how that's done I'm not sure. I'm not sure if there's just one DIMM with an 8 GB that can take a 16 GB module, 2 DIMMs with one available, or one DIMM available with 8 GB soldered on. Any of those would work for me.

I've only seen tear downs of the 14" model. At least from what I've been seeing in some of the Lenovo and Asus models, the 15" class has had actual DIMM slots while the 14" and smaller have been soldered. Of course, there are exceptions to everything.

I'm just hoping the 16 GB maximum is allowing for expandability.

15" is starting to pop up here (Amazon has a iGPU model only), so maybe we'll find out soon.
- Andrei Girbea
  
  October 4, 2017 at 5:31 am
  
  That could also mean that there's either an option with 8 GB or 16 GB, both soldered. Normally the 14 and 15 inch models share the same internals, but hopefully that's not the case here.
  - Kris
    
    October 4, 2017 at 11:18 am
    
    True. I'm hoping there's a socket as Acer seems to skimp on memory quantity except in their higher end laptops. More available if you want it, but they don't have to include the cost or create a different SKU. Most seem to settle around 8 GB, with 4 GB on low end.
    
    Guess we won't know until you get one or someone else is able to open one up.
    
    Sometimes I wish vendors would make this info easier to find.
  - Andrei Girbea
    
    October 4, 2017 at 11:27 am
    
    I double checked with Acer today, they don't have an estimate for the 15inch model's availability over here. Hopefully someone else gets it and posts these details, I'd keep an eye on Reddit and the forum on notebookreview.com
Kyle

October 11, 2017 at 12:29 pm

I know this is the 14" model review but,

What's the difference between Acer Swift 3 and Aspire 5, the 15.6" models with MX150)? Other than maintenance, ports, and some parts like Wi-Fi chips and power supply they seem almost identical which doesn't explain the price gap. Build quality maybe? I've read both yours and NBCs' reviews yet can't seem to figure this out.

ultrabookreview.com/15876-acer-aspire-5-a515-51-review/
notebookcheck.net/Acer-Swift-3-SF315-i5-7200U-GeForce-MX150-Laptop-Review.257492.0.html
notebookcheck.net/Acer-Aspire-5-A515-51G-7200U-MX150-FHD-Laptop-Review.240090.0.html
- Andrei Girbea
  
  October 14, 2017 at 12:29 pm
  
  They're very similar specs wise, same CPU/GPU and nearly the same battery. Not sure if the internals are the same as well, I didn't get to look at the 15-inch Swift 3. As far as I can tell the main difference between them is just at the case level, aesthetically.
  
  You should also check out if they have different screens, different keyboards and what notebokcheck have to say about the speakers and wireless performance.
Jonathan

November 4, 2017 at 4:29 am

Hi, will you be re-reviewing this laptop with the i5-8250U processor and MX 150 now that it has been released?

If you are able to get a hold of a unit that has the i5-8250 with the HD620 internal graphics only that would be a favor to canadians since at this time I can't find a canadian seller with both the 8th gen CPU and the MX 150 card in a 14 inch frame (not even the canadian acer site has this option :/ )
- Andrei Girbea
  
  November 4, 2017 at 1:39 pm
  
  I might, can't tell fro sure though. Everything mentioned in here stands for that config as well though, aside for the performance and temps sections.
Hugo

November 20, 2017 at 7:12 pm

Hi thanks for this amazingly detailed review !
I was wondering, the games and the fps shown, were they tested on this laptop, the acer swift 3 with i7-7500U and MX150 or are these from another system with just the MX150 but other CPU,ram etc?
- Andrei Girbea
  
  November 21, 2017 at 6:15 am
  
  This laptop in the mentioned configuration: i7-7500 and mx150.
Simon

August 4, 2018 at 10:43 pm

SF314-52-52V8

i5-8250U Intel UHD graphics 620, 3220 mAh Li-ion battery 10 hours.

Sorry to be late to the party but we just bought this for our mom, mostly for the screen (!!!) who looked much better at Best Buy then the other cheaper laptops, and for the 10 hours battery life.

Now, I know nothing about nothing, dumb as a stick here, but the 10 hours marketing battery thing got me. Yet, my mom tells me she's getting about 5 hours battery life on her 5 days old brand new Acer. I thought the 10 hours battery life meant she would be getting at least 8-9 hours for the first year or two…

All my mom does is browse, facebook, Skype, email, browse, browse, browse… That's pretty much it. No games, no movies.

Now, coming here what I understand is that what she does is everyday browsing and that's the second most taxing on the battery after gaming. So the 5 hours she's getting looks okay after all.

Is that an Acer thing or any laptops would give her around 5 hours battery life for everyday browsing?

Thanks a lot!
- Andrei Girbea
  
  August 5, 2018 at 2:36 pm
  
  It's not. Browsers are pretty taxing these days and you can expect to get about 1h of browsing per 10-12W of battery capacity, generally speaking, from this kind of hardware and the screen's brightness at about 50%, no matter the manufacturer. This laptop gets a 48 Wh battery, hence about 4-5 hours of browsing. The advertised 10h are, well, advertisement, but you can get close to that with video content, so it's not entirely untrue :)
  
  And for what it's worth, this Acer actually gets a bigger battery than most other laptops in the same price range. Using the power profiles in Windows (click on battery, choose Better Battery) and dimming the screen should help getting longer run-times to some extent, but don't expect much.
  - Simon
    
    August 5, 2018 at 10:12 pm
    
    Thank you Andrei,
    
    I was about to return the laptop thinking the battery might be defective but it doesn't seem to be the case after all. You're the only review I read that talks about how a battery works so thanks for that. All other reviews says the Acer has great battery life… 5 hours isn't great in my book but it is what it is after all.
    
    Thanks again Andrei!

Keep in mind: We manually approve each comment. This way, we can attend to all your questions and requests. There's no need to submit a comment twice, just be patient till we get to it. Thank you!

Acer Swift 3 SF314-52 review – budget 14-inch laptop with Nvidia MX150 graphics

37 Comments

Categories

Latest reviews

Razer Blade 16 review, 3 months later (2025 generation)

Comparisons and Tops

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 vs. Razer Blade 16, Asus ProArt P16 comparison