Is the new XPS 15 9575 2-in-1 faster than the old XPS 15 9560? Yes, no, and maybe.

The XPS 15 2-in-1 9575 is newer than the XPS 15 9560, but is it faster?
By Douglas Black, last updated on April 30, 2018

Take a look at the r/Dell sub-reddit and one of the most common questions you’ll see being asked whether one should upgrade from the XPS 15 9560 to the new XPS 15 9575 2-in-1.

Naturally, one of the main factors influencing this decision is whether or not you would benefit from the ability to draw on a touchscreen with an active-stylus (and of course, whether or not you like dongles). But the other big one is performance: Is the 2-in-1 with its new Core i7-8705G CPU with integrated Radeon Vega graphics an upgrade, side-grade, or downgrade from the 9560’s venerable i7-7700HQ and GeForce GTX 1050? The answer at the moment seems to be possibly all three.

Let’s start with the easiest question to answer: CPU performance. According to my colleague over at, Allen Ngo, his i5-8305G-equipped XPS 15 9575 with 8GB of ram and matched the XPS 15 9560 with i7 CPU and 16GB of RAM in Cinebench Single, both scoring 157 points. This is not exactly a surprise when you look at the specs of the two chips, however: they are both quad-core hyper-threaded chips based on Kaby Lake; they have exact same turbo frequencies for both single and all cores, and they both have 6MB of cache.

The XPS 15 2-in-1 9575 is newer than the XPS 15 9560, but is it faster?

The XPS 15 2-in-1 9575 is newer than the XPS 15 9560, but is it faster?

The Cinebench multi-core benchmark is a bit of an oddity. Most i7-7700HQ chips score around 750 points. Here, we find i5-8305G scoring 681 points, falling 7% behind the i7-7700HQ. This is strange given the parity in specs. It gets even stranger, however: Other reviews show the i7-8705G performing even slower than the i5 version despite the i7-8705G having a 300MHz and 2MB cache advantage over both the i7-7700HQ and the i5-8305G. The only conclusion I can draw from this at the moment is that the i7-8705G in the XPS 2-in-1 is performing more slowly due to hitting self-imposed thermal limits and throttling. This also means that undervolting, repasting, or fan/firmware tuning by Dell may remedy this situation down the line.

So, for the CPU, it looks like the XPS 15 2-in-1 beats out the 9560 in single-core performance, but loses out in multi-core performance potentially due to thermals in this particular implementation.

The GPU is where things get tricky, however.

Going by benchmark results alone, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL in the XPS 15 2-in-1 is around 10% faster than the GTX 1050 in last year’s XPS 15 9560. This is an absolutely fantastic showing for an integrated GPU using less than half the wattage of the GTX 1050 (an estimated 20W vs 40-50W of the 1050). It looks like the XPS 15 2-in-1 could be a better choice for gaming than the XPS 15 9560 (especially if they fixed their VRM throttling)… but the real world performance turns out to be erratic.

As Lisa Gade notes in her XPS 15 9575 review (below), some games run fantastically while others inexplicably slow to a crawl regardless of detail settings.

It certainly seems to be an issue regarding the unique graphics solution in these Intel-AMD partnered chips, but the question of whether future driver updates will remedy the real-world situation to reflect the synthetic benchmark scores is an open-ended one.

I am interested in getting my hands on the XPS 15 2-in-1 and its more available competitor, the HP Spectre x360 15. Hopefully, Nvidia’s “GeForce Partner Program” doesn’t succeed in killing off the Kaby Lake-G platform, and then Dell, Microsoft, and AMD will have the time to work the remaining kinks out of these intriguing chips.


Disclaimer: Our content is reader-supported. If you buy through some of the links on our site, we may earn a commission. Terms.
Author at
Article by: Douglas Black
Douglas Black - Editor. Douglas is a technical writer, educator, DJ, and music producer based in Florida, USA.


  1. Mike

    April 27, 2018 at 7:48 pm

    I'd personally get the spectre because I prefer the design and it has a standard usb port and a full sd card slot. But unfortunately the Intel-AMD version of the spectre 15 is not available here in Canada and I do not know if it will be. The dell xps15 2in1 is available in Canada and even offers a black version which is fantastic but the price is a bit too much for me, it costs $2,949.99 CAD now for a i7, 256gb ad 16gb ram model, with 4k, that's a bit rich and ridiculous. I could get a much better gaming laptop for such money.

  2. Kyle

    April 28, 2018 at 9:36 am

    General consensus is that Spectre is a better value of the two. But personally I'll wait out because of some glaring problems: lack of high quality FHD screen option, no centered keyboard option, AMD dGPU compatibility and maturity issues with professional software and games, etc. Unfortunately Lenovo's Yoga 730 series seem like a disappointing downgrade according to Hopefully OEMs will come up with something better in the following 6 months.

  3. Nemo

    July 22, 2018 at 4:03 am

    The problem, to me, with the Spectre 2-in1 (which I quite like and would go with if not for the issue) is the color gamut of the screen. From other reviews I’ve read, the screen doesn’t even manage full sRGB. The Dell 2-in-1 at least approaches more closely this spec. The Dell is also more compact and seems to implement the i7-8707G potential more full. Bummer. I’d really like the HP, but to me the Dell wins.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *