Table of Contents
In this article, we discuss the AMD Gorgon Point hardware platform, launched in early 2026, which powers the majority of AMD laptops available this year and into the first part of 2027.
Gorgon Point is a mid-cycle refresh of the existing AMD Strix Point and AMD Krackan Point platforms discussed in previous articles. That means the Ryzen AI 400 Series APUs are built on the same core technology as past AMD hardware, featuring a mix of Zen5 performance and Zen5c efficiency processor cores, along with Radeon iGPUs that utilize RDNA3.5 Compute Cores. Compared to the Ryzen AI 300 predecessors, Gorgon Point offers minor refinements and updates in clock speeds – however, some of the devices built on this hardware do offer updated designs and features for this year.
Much like in the past, the upper-tier processors are the Ryzen AI 9 SKUs, while the mid and lower-tier options are the Ryzen AI 7 and AI 5 options. The two implement the same CPU/GPU technology, just with fewer cores and lower speeds as we go down the lineup.
However, it’s important to understand that Gorgon Point is not a major hardware refresh. That’s only coming in 2027 with the AMD Medusa Halo and Halo Mini platforms (naming still to be confirmed), with Zen6/Zen6c CPU cores (up to 26C/52T), updated graphics built on RDNA5 cores (up to 48 CUs), and support for LPDDR6 memory. But these are at least a year out at the time I’m writing this article, so Gorgon Point is all we’re getting this year for portable laptops, alongside Strix Halo for select higher-performance options and Fire Range HX for a handful of full-size high-performance notebooks.
So let’s dive into these Ryzen AI 400 lineups and figure out what they’re all about. Here’s preview of the entire CPU roster.
While AMD no longer offers these as separate sub-lineups as with the Ryzen AI 300 generations, we should still discuss the Ryzen AI 9 and Ryzen AI 7/5 options separately, since they are meant for different kinds of devices.
So here are the three Gorgon Point Ryzen AI 9 400 SKUs (Ryzen AI 9 HX 475, Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, and Ryzen AI 9 465), next to their Strix Point Ryzen AI 300 counterparts that they are replacing.
You’ll mostly find these in more powerful notebooks between 14 and 16 inches in size, sometimes paired with Nvidia dedicated GPUs, especially in the larger models.
| Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 / HX 470 |
Ryzen AI 9 465 |
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 / HX 370 |
Ryzen AI 9 365 |
|
| Build process | TSMC 4nm FinFET | |||
| Generation | Gorgon Point Zen5, Zen5c |
Strix Point Zen5, Zen5c |
||
| TDP | 15-54 W | |||
| Cores/Threads | 4x Zen5, 8x Zen5c, 24 Threads |
4x Zen5, 6x Zen5c, 20 Threads |
4x Zen5, 8x Zen5c, 24 Threads |
4x Zen5, 6x Zen5c, 20 Threads |
| CPU Max Turbo | up to 5.2 GHz – Zen5, up to 3.3 GHz – Zen5c |
up to 5.0 GHz – Zen5, up to 3.3 GHz – Zen5c |
up to 5.1 GHz – Zen5, up to 3.3 GHz – Zen5c |
up to 5.0 GHz – Zen5, up to 3.3 GHz – Zen5c |
| L2+L3 Cache | 36 MB | 34 MB | 36 MB | 34 MB |
| Memory Type | DDR5-5600, LPDDR5x-8533 | DDR5-5600, LPDDR5x-8000 | ||
| Graphics | Radeon 890M, 16x RDNA3.5 CUs, up to 3.1 GHz |
Radeon 880M, 12x RDNA3.5 CUs, up to 2.9 GHz |
Radeon 890M, 16x RDNA3.5 CUs, up to 2.9 GHz |
Radeon 880M, 12x RDNA3.5 CUs, up to 2.9 GHz |
| AI Engine | NPU – up to 60 TOPS (R 475) Total – up to 91 TOPS (R 475) NPU – up to 55 TOPS (R 470) Total – up to 86 TOPS (R 470) |
NPU – up to 50 TOPS Total – up to 73 TOPS |
NPU – up to 55 TOPS (R 375) Total – up to 85 TOPS (R 375) NPU – up to 50 TOPS (R 370) Total – up to 80 TOPS (R 370) |
NPU – up to 50 TOPS Total – up to 73 TOPS |
Very little to nothing has changed:
- a minor bump in CPU and GPU maximum Turbo speeds – but keep in mind that the iGPU only runs at full speeds in the more powerful designs at 40+W sustained;
- support for faster LPDDR5x-8533 memory (still 128-bit memory bus);
- an updated NPU that allows 60 TOPS on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 (still an XDNA 2 architecture);
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 and HX 470 are still identical with 12C/24T and a Radeon 890M iGPU with 16 Compute Units, with just the updated NPU on the 475; expect most retail notebooks to be built around the 470 SKU.
The Ryzen AI 9 465 slots in beneath the AI 9 HX options, with 10C/20T (but still 4x Zen5 main cores) and a Radeon 880M with 12 Compute Units. It’s still competitive on the CPU side, at 5-10% slower than the 470/475 options in sustained loads, something to keep in mind if you’re after a device that pairs the AMD processor with a dGPU. In fact, more OEMs choose to implement the Ryzen AI 9 465 on their 2026 models than before. At the same time, it’s not as competitive on the iGPU side, with 25% fewer graphics cores – something to keep in mind when looking at a device that relies entirely on the iGPU and lacks a dGPU.
All these being said, there’s no wonder some OEMs chose not to update their devices to Gorgon Point and keep offering their Strix Point implementations for 2026.
When it comes to these higher-tier Ryzen AI 9 SKUs, this platform is just a name update. So, if you’re choosing a 2026 model over a 2025 variant, make sure you’re doing it for other reasons and not for any performance/efficiency benefits that you would expect from the Ryzen AI 9 400 series hardware. However, we can hope for better availability and more affordable pricing with this hardware generation, all things considered.
Of course, there are still differences to account for between implementations, with regards to the power settings and cooling capacity of each device. When it comes to the more portable options, expect those to run at 25-35W sustained, while the larger formats can allow up to 80W of sustained power, even if in theory the hardware is only a 15-54W design – that just means it already runs at almost its best at 54W and a higher-power allocation doesn’t change performance in a significant way. You’ll have to look into specific details for more information on the performance and capabilities of each unit.
With these out of the way, here are the Gorgon Point Ryzen AI 7/5 400 SKUs next to their Krackan Point Ryzen AI 300 counterparts that they are replacing. You’ll mostly find these in mid-range portable models between 14 and 16 inches in size, generally as standalone implementations. There are a couple of other lower-tier Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 3 SKUs with 4C/8T and 4 CUs iGPU that I haven’t included here, targeted at budget-tier devices.
| Ryzen AI 7 450 |
Ryzen AI 7 445, Ryzen AI 5 435 |
Ryzen AI 7 350 | Ryzen AI 5 340 | |
| Build process | TSMC 4nm FinFET | |||
| Generation | Gorgon Point Zen5, Zen5c |
Krackan Point Zen5, Zen5c |
||
| TDP | 15-54 W | |||
| Cores/Threads | 4x Zen5, 4x Zen5c, 16 Threads |
2x Zen5, 4x Zen5c, 12 Threads |
4x Zen5, 4x Zen5c, 16 Threads |
3x Zen5, 3x Zen5c, 12 Threads |
| CPU Max Turbo | up to 5.1 GHz – Zen5, up to 3.6 GHz – Zen5c |
up to 4.6 GHz – Zen5, up to 3.4 GHz – Zen5c |
up to 5.0 GHz – Zen5, up to 3.5 GHz – Zen5c |
up to 4.8 GHz – Zen5, up to 3.4 GHz – Zen5c |
| L2+L3 Cache | 24 MB | 14 MB | 24 MB | 22 MB |
| Memory Type | DDR5-5600, LPDDR5x-8000 | |||
| Graphics | Radeon 860M, 8x RDNA3.5 CUs, up to 3.1 GHz |
Radeon 840M, 4x RDNA3.5 CUs, up to 2.9 GHz – R 445 up to 2.8 GHz – R 435 |
Radeon 860M, 8x RDNA3.5 CUs, up to 2.9 GHz |
Radeon 840M, 4x RDNA3.5 CUs, up to 2.9 GHz |
| AI Engine | NPU – up to 50 TOPS Total – up to 66 TOPS |
NPU – up to 50 TOPS Total – up to 59 TOPS |
NPU – up to 50 TOPS Total – up to 66 TOPS |
NPU – up to 50 TOPS Total – up to 59 TOPS |
The Ryzen AI 7 450 remains a competitive mid-tier processor with still 8Cores and 8x CUs on the iGPU. That’s plenty capable for a lightweight and compact device, and based on our experience with the Ryzen AI 7 350 models we’ve tested, the hardware is going to run efficiently and quietly as well.
At the same time, the changes are once more minor to none over the Ryzen AI 7 350 that it replaces, with still minimal increases in CPU/GPU clock speeds.
The lower-tier Ryzen AI 7/5 models are different from those in the past, though, as they implement a 2x Zen5, 4x Zen5c configuration on the CPU side, alongside a Radeon 840M iGPU with only 4x CUs. In the past, the Ryzen AI 5 340 implemented 3x Zen5 with 3x Zen5c cores in a somewhat more capable CPU.
Furthermore, the addition of the Ryzen AI 7 445 SKU will only confuse buyers, as this is identical in features and specs to the Ryzen AI 5 435, with minimal increases in CPU/GPU max clocks. And that means potential buyers could choose a Ryzen AI 7 445 notebook hoping it’s a better processor than the Ryzen AI 5 435, even if in reality it is not. I would have preferred a leaner lineup of Ryzen AI 7 and AI 5 options.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 / 465 and Ryzen AI 7 450 /435 benchmarks and performance
With these being the platforms that you’ll find in most devices this year, I’ll quickly touch on their capabilities and performance expectations.
However, I haven’t tested any of these 2026 devices yet, so I will update this section once we get to test the 2026 Ryzen AI 400 platforms.
In the meantime, I’ll leave you with some numbers for the Ryzen AI 300 counterparts tested in the past (and we already explained that the Ryzen AI 400 platforms are going to perform more or less similarly).
— updating
| AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 + Rad 890M, ~80W – ProArt P16 |
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 + Rad 880M, ~50W – Yoga Pro 7 |
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 + Rad 890M, ~33W mode – Zenbook S16 |
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 + Rad 880M, ~25W mode – Yoga Pro 7 |
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 + Rad 860M, ~28W mode – Zenbook 14 |
|
| 3DMark – Fire Strike | 8706 (G – 9591, P – 26877, C – 3280) | 8835 (G – 9563, P – 28655, C – 3388) | 7505 (G – 7946, P – 25618, C – 3031) | 7925 (G – 8626, P – 23070, C – 3055) | 6701 (G – 7388, P – 23946, C – 2413) |
| 3DMark – Time Spy | 3836 (Graphics – 3462, CPU – 9903) | 3853 (Graphics – 3462, CPU – 10712) | 3598 (Graphics – 3241, CPU – 9599) | 3503 (Graphics – 3164, CPU – 8944) | 2893 (Graphics – 2577, CPU – 9511) |
| Uniengine Superposition – 1080p Extreme | 1911 | 1809 | 1600 | 1628 | 1304 |
| CineBench R23 (best run) | 19074 cb – multi core, 2002 cb – single core |
19286 cb – multi core, 1966 cb – single core |
17484 cb – multi core, 1950 cb – single core |
13626 cb – multi core, 1956 cb – single core |
14436 cb – multi core, 1948 cb – single core |
| Blender 3.01 – Classroom scene – CPU Compute |
4m 29s | 5m 28s | 5m 12s | 6m 41s | 7m 15s |
| SPECviewperf 2020 – 3DSMax: | 45.34 | 44.52 | 40.95 | 39.75 | 36.94 |
| SPECviewperf 2020 – Catia: | 39.43 | 40.00 | 33.25 | 36.66 | 35.63 |
| SPECviewperf 2020 – Maya: | 150.32 | 141.58 | 125.32 | 134.45 | 93.85 |
These results showcase a few interesting things:
- the Ryzen 9 x70 and x65 processors are close in CPU performance in mid-power implementations, with some advantages for the x70 CPU in longer sustained loads.
- the Radeon 890M in the x70 holds a 15-20% advantage in GPU performance over the Radeon 880m in the x65;
- the Ryzen AI 7 is still a competitive CPU with its 4x Zen5 4xZen5c design, close to the other two in low to mid-powered notebooks;
- the Radeon 860M in the Ryzen AI 7 still scores at about 60-65% of the Radeon 890M, despite having half the CUs;
- expect the Ryzen AI 9 470, Ryzen AI 9 465 and Ryzen AI 7 450 to perform within a few percent of their Ryzen 300 counterparts;
- the Ryzen AI 7 445 with its 2x Zen5 6xZen5c design will run about 10% slower than the AI 7 450 in sustained CPU loads, but otherwise match its capabilities.
List of Laptops built on AMD Gorgon Point (Ryzen AI 400) hardware
This section lists all the available notebooks built on Gorgon Point hardware, with either the upper-level Ryzen AI 9 specs implementation in more powerful devices (sometimes alongside Nvidia dedicated graphics), or the mid-level Ryzen AI 7 450/ Ryzen AI 7 445 meant for ultraportable designs and more affordable options.
The specs for each series can get a little confusing now that these platforms have been unified, so it’s important to understand the particularities of each AMD processor.
This list is a work in progress, and we’re upgrading the article as new units are announced. If you spot any device that should be in here and is not yet, let us know about it in the comments section at the end of the article.
| Model | Format, Weight | Screen | Hardware and particularities | Battery |
| Acer Aspire 14 AI | entry-tier ultrabook, 1.27 kg / 2.8 lbs |
14″ 16:10, OLED or IPS up to 3K 120Hz, touch or non-touch 180-hinge |
up to AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, max 32 GB LPDDR5x RAM, 1x M.2 SSD |
65 Wh |
| Acer Aspire 16 AI | entry-tier ultrabook, 1.55 kg / 3.4 lbs |
14″ 16:10, OLED or IPS up to 3K 120Hz, touch or non-touch 180-hinge |
up to AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, max 32 GB LPDDR5x RAM, 1x M.2 SSD |
65 Wh |
| Acer Swift Go 16 AI | mid-tier portable laptop, all-metal build, 1.6 kg / 3.5 lbs |
16″ 16:10, OLED 2K 60Hz touch on non-touch, 180-hinge |
up to AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, max 32 GB LPDDR5x RAM, 2x M.2 SSD, ~45W TDP; dual-fan single-heatsink dual-heatpipe cooling |
65 Wh |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI | mid-tier all-around laptop, mostly metal build, 2.1 kg / 4.65 lbs |
16″ IPS, matte, 2K 180Hz |
up to AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, RTX 5070 ??W max 32 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x slots, 2x M.2 SSD, dual-fan quad-exhaust cooling |
76 Wh |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 | premium portable laptop, premium metal build, 1.5 kg / 3.31 lbs |
14″ 16:10 OLED 3K 120Hz, glossy non-touch |
up to AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, RTX 5060 90W, max 32 GB LPDDR5x, 1x M.2 SSD ~120W TDP; advanced cooling |
73 Wh |
| Asus TUF Gaming A14 | mid-tier portable laptop, part metal build, 1.46 kg / 3.22 lbs |
14″ 16:10 IPS 2.5K 165Hz, matte non-touch |
up to AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, RTX 5060 105W, max 32 GB LPDDR5x, 2x M.2 SSD ~130W TDP; advanced cooling |
73 Wh |
| Asus Vivobook S14 M3407 | mid-tier ultrabook, metal build, 1.4 kg / 3.1 lbs |
14″ 16:10 OLED 2K 60Hz, non-touch |
up to AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, max 32 GB LDDR5, 1xDIMM, 1x M.2 SSD ~35W TDP; |
70 Wh |
| Asus Vivobook S16 M3607 | mid-tier ultrabook, metal build, 1.7 kg / 3.75 lbs |
16″ 16:10 IPS touch or OLED non-touch 2K 120Hz |
up to AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, max 32 GB LDDR5, 1xDIMM, 1x M.2 SSD ~35W TDP; |
70 Wh |
| Asus Zenbook 14 | mid-tier ultrabook, all-metal build; 1.2 kg / 2.65 lbs |
14″ 16:10 OLED up to 2K 120Hz, mostly non-touch |
up to AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, max 32 GB LPDDR5x RAM, 1x M.2 SSD, ~28W TDP; single-fan single-heatsink single-heatpipe cooling |
75 Wh |
| Asus Zenbook S16 | premium ultrabook, all-metal build; 1.5 kg / 3.3 lbs |
16″ 16:10 OLED 3K 120Hz, mostly touch |
up to AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, max 32 GB LPDDR5x RAM, 1x M.2 SSD, ~35W TDP; updated vapor-chamber cooling |
83 Wh |
| HP EliteBook X G2a 14 | business laptop, premium, clamshell, from 1.12 kg / 2.47 lbs |
14″ 16:10 IPS/OLED up to 3K 120Hz, matte or touch. 150-degree hinge |
up to AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, max 64GB LPDDR5x RAM, 1x M.2 SSD |
56 Wh |
| Lenovo Legion 5a | mid-range all-rounder, 1.9 kg / 4.15 lbs |
15.3″ 16:10 OLED 2.5K 240Hz, non-touch |
up to AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, RTX 5060 115W, max 64 GB DDR5, 2x DIMMs, 2x M.2 SSD ~140W TDP; advanced cooling |
80 Wh |
| Lenovo Legion 7a | premium all-rounder, all metal build, 1.85 kg / 4.05 lbs |
16″ 16:10 OLED 2.5K 165Hz, non-touch |
up to AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, RTX 5060 115W, max 64 GB LPDDR5x, 2x M.2 SSD ~140W TDP; advanced cooling |
84 Wh |
That’s about it for this article.
But as mentioned already, stay around, we’re constantly updating these lists of laptops built on AMD’s Gorgon Point Ryzen AI 400 Series hardware, adding new launches as they are released.




